Tribunal Court

In: Social Issues

Submitted By pipilotta1994
Words 546
Pages 3
SPEED-tribunal cases are highly regarded and most times initially attended to in court, and are frequently arranged on, within a day or two. They are constantly defined on how long can a person wait before their case can be heard and decided upon so that the person do not have to be going back and forth.
COST-in the tribunal system cost are quite reasonable as fined can be divided into halves so that the defendant do not have to pay the whole sum of money. and sometimes one can always represent themselves without the aid of authorised officials.
INFORMALITY-it is a bit different from law courts as in law courts wigs and gowns are worn but in this system judiciary dresses as normal everyday worker so it does not create an intimidating atmosphere for people without legal advisors. flexibility SPECIALISATION-tribunal members have all got a speciality in a specific subject area, and through sitting on tribunals are able to build up depth of knowledge of that area that judges in ordinary court could not hope to match.
RELIEF WORK OVERLOAD FROM COURT-it reduces the number of cases sent to the main court as they deal with also important cases and the courts are not overloaded.
AWARENESS OF POLICY-the tribunal members because of their expertise are likely to understand the policy behind legislation in their area, and often have large discretionary power in their to use.
PRIVACY-members of the tribunal most times meets in privacy so that they do not broadcast individual circumstances in the general public.

LACK OF OPENESS-because tribunals members are met in private can sometimes creates doubt in their fairness of decision making.
UNAVAILIBITY OF STATE FUND-legal funding in the tribunal system are only available for a small range of cases, there is sometimes not a need for legal representative but for…...

Similar Documents

Court Systems

...Court System Introduction The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of the history of judicial system prevailing within the premises of United States. This paper intends to explore the Court System of United States. The major historical developments in the courts of United States will be discussed. Moreover, the rationale of the dual court system of the United States will be outlined. This paper will also explore the correlation between the historical developments and the dual court system of the United States. Discussion The development of the state courts within United States can be traced back from the colonial period. Every state in United States organizes its court system independently. Every state has been provided with the right to choose its own organizational structures and the possible jurisdictions of their respective courts. Various types of courts have been developed throughout the history of United States. The federal level states have trial courts normally called district courts and circuit courts which are the appellate tribunals. In New York most of the trial courts are considered supreme courts (Columbia Encyclopedia, 2007). The development of court system started in the colonial period. Local judges were called magistrates on the lowest level of their colonial judiciary. By the early eighteenth century, the development of formal courts started. After the American Revolution in 1775, distrust towards the......

Words: 1195 - Pages: 5

The Court System of Jamaica

...A court is a tribunal or governmental institution with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between parties and carry out administration of justice in civil, criminal and administrative matters. The legal tradition prominent in the Commonwealth Caribbean is that of the common law tradition, which originated in England, the court system of the territories is also influenced by tradition. The courts in the region are modeled on those of England. The power to create and regulate such court systems, however, is no longer derived from colonizing power, but from the written Constitutions and other local statutory instruments to be found in the territories which have gained independence. In the majority of the Commonwealth Caribbean the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council sits at the apex of this hierarchy of courts while others have replaced it with the Caribbean Court of Justice (the CCJ). Consequently, decisions of judgments emanating from the Privy Council or the Caribbean Court of Justice are the most authoritative in the hierarchy. Next in the hierarchical structure are the Courts of Appeal, then the Supreme Courts or High Courts followed by intermediate courts such as the Family Courts, Resident Magistrates' Courts and Juvenile Courts which are inferior courts and has the least authority. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council This court is comprised of Law Lords of the United Kingdom and hears appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeal of......

Words: 1271 - Pages: 6


...The case being presented today was State of New Jersey v. David Connor. This case is being presented in the Superior Courts of New Jersey at 50 West Market Street floor 10 Room 1004, Newark, NJ. The observation took place July 1, 2008 from 9AM until 3:30PM. The charges against the defendant David Connor are first-degree murder, second-degree aggravated assault, second-degree disturbing/moving human body, third degree unlawful possession of a weapon, and third degree possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose. David Connor has a co-defendant by the name of Tareek Gilliam. The judge presiding over the case is the Honorable Joseph Cassini. Romesh Sukhdeo is the assistant prosecutor from the Essex County Prosecutors Office and John McMahon is the public defender representing the defendant. Honorable Joseph Cassini began the morning addressing a motion to dismiss the indictment submitted by the public defender McMahon on the grounds that the prosecutor answered questions for the jury and the actions of the assistant prosecutor were inappropriate. The motion also stated that the assistant prosecutor became the witness. The judge also reviewed the proceedings that were mentioned in the motion to dismiss the indictment in which the prosecutor actually was answering questions the jury members had asked. Honorable Joseph Cassini sighted numerous cases including State v Bennett, A-2157-04T5 where the prosecutor misstatements and improper comments constitutes......

Words: 293 - Pages: 2


...been attending court everyday for different reasons. Those reasons can be for traffic violations, civil law suits, or unlawful criminal acts that are committed. These acts are all handled and disputed in a court of law. The courts are empowered to make fair and blending decisions upon the facts that are provided through out the court hearings. As we know there are two types of courts such as civil court and criminal court and it is very important that we understand the differences between the two. The civil courts handle resolutions between private parties that usually consist of one party suing one another for some type of monetary damages. The criminal courts alleged offenders that are suspected for crimes that they committed and which at times they end in freedom for the offender or and prison cell. The court system is judicial brunch of government which the defendants go before a judge and their peers and to defend their innocence of a crime that they committed. The major role of the court is to settle people’s disputes in a civilized manner. Our court system is divided into four major components which are to uphold the law, protect individuals, resolve disputes, and reinforce social norms. The Untied States court system is run by a dual court system. There are two types of systems that make up the dual court systems and they are the Federal and State. The dual court system refers to the fact that the US has a federal court system and forty separate state court......

Words: 748 - Pages: 3

Court issues. Stewart was diagnosed at the age of 23 with Bi-Polar Disorder. Stewart has seldomnly taken medication for the disorder. Stewart was abused by her parents and no longer keeps in contact with them. Stewart had prior use of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, but her last contact with those drugs was one month ago. On the other hand, Stewart has an Associate’s Degree in Business and had obtained an employment position as an office manager in the past. Stewart was recently fired from her three year employment due to being arrested. Furthermore, Stewart has been married on two times and is currently divorced. Stewart has three children, ages 12, 15, and 17, but does not have custody of them for the past seven months because of a family court order. IV. Federal Sentencing Guidelines Overall Fairness Defendant #1: Judge, I believe the sentence of Manny Ramirez serves the interest of justice because it is enough time being in jail to pay the consequences for his actions. Ramirez was given multiple chances of shortened sentences and more probation time for minor offenses. Obviously, Mr. Ramirez did not learn his lesson the first time and he eventually got caught at the wrong time with his current offense. Based on the following actions, judge, the sentence of 21-27 months is fair enough to me and serves justice for what crimes he committed. Defendant #2: Judge, the sentence of Martha Stewart definitely serves the interest of justice based upon the seriousness......

Words: 1362 - Pages: 6

Leung Chi Keung V Market Misconduct Tribunal

...Leung Chi Keung v Market Misconduct Tribunal 18 April 2012 Court of Appeal CA Civil Appeal No 256 of 2010 CACV 256/2010 Citations:|[2012] 2 HKLRD 786 English Judgment[2012] HKEC 535 English Judgment| Presiding Judges: |Cheung, Yuen and Chu JJA| Phrases: |Banking and finance - insider dealing - fund manager found culpable by dealing in shares of company after equity salesman gave him information about proposed placement of company's shares - whether s.270(1)(e) elements that equity salesman "connected person", fund manager's knowledge that equity salesman was "connected person", and "relevant information" established - objective test for "connected person" - Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571) s.270(1)(e) | Facts: *786 C, a listed company, wished to raise money by a top-up placement of its shares (the Placement). SC, a securities company, was eventually responsible for this and the placement was announced on 26 January 2004. Y was the Equity Salesman in the Sales Department, a public area, within SC. While SC had been negotiating with C, the Equity Capital and Derivatives Market Department (ECDMD) tasked Y to sound out potential investors for the Placement. The SC had a "Chinese Wall Policy" (the Wall) prohibiting the flow of inside information from the insider area of the firm (such as the ECDMD) to public areas (such as the Sales Department where Y worked), unless there was a valid business purpose for such communication, in which case the Compliance*787 ...

Words: 17487 - Pages: 70

Admin Tribunal Report

...I INTRODUCTION The primary role of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) is to review the decision of the original administrator and to come to a decision that is the correct or preferable one based on the facts. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) guides its operation, in that it must provide a review process that is “fair, just, economical, informal and quick.” In observing the proceedings of Tusitala and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, it is evident that the tribunal has an enhanced ability to gather relevant information compared to the original decision maker. This information is potentially valuable and should be given proper weight to when making a decision. It is also apparent that the objects of fair and just are naturally contradictory to economical, informal and quick. Nonetheless, the AAT reconciles competing aims through its flexibility to deal with proceedings as it deems fit. II HEIGHTENED ABILITY OF TRIBUNAL TO ASCERTAIN RELEVANT INFORMATION One of the principle features of the AAT is its enhanced ability to collect and find facts in making a decision affecting the rights of the applicants. The Senior Member (SM) of the tribunal indicated that she has to come to her own conclusion, which is the correct or preferable one, on the materials before her instead of the material before the original decision maker. It is notable that the SM can give appropriate weight to other factors beyond character grounds set out by the......

Words: 1139 - Pages: 5

156- Tribunals

...introduced here. Appeal Tribunals- This is where the cases that have already been sentenced by different court or committee are reconsidered. Appeal Tribunals- This is where the cases that have already been sentenced by different court or committee are reconsidered. Appeal with Leave. Appeal with Leave. Appeal with Leave. Appeal with Leave. Appeal with Leave- Appeal with leave is when the verdict on a case has not been made fair, then after they can make an appeal for the case to have different judgement. Appeal with Leave- Appeal with leave is when the verdict on a case has not been made fair, then after they can make an appeal for the case to have different judgement. Chancery Division- Chancery division is part of the High Court of Justice, this division deals with; business law, land law and other business related cases. Chancery Division- Chancery division is part of the High Court of Justice, this division deals with; business law, land law and other business related cases. Commercial Court- Commercial courts, is part of the High Court of Justice, which was established in 2004. This court deals with business disputes, national and internationally. Commercial Court- Commercial courts, is part of the High Court of Justice, which was established in 2004. This court deals with business disputes, national and internationally. Queen’s Bench Division- Queens Bench Division is one part of the three divisions of the High Court of Justice. This division,......

Words: 500 - Pages: 2


...Week 1 Assignment State Court System Trial Courts Trial Courts are also called "Superior Courts." There are 58 Trial Courts--one in each county. In the Trial Courts, a judge, and sometimes a jury, hears testimony and evidence and decides a case by applying the law to the facts of the case. Superior Courts handle: * All criminal cases (felonies, misdemeanors, and traffic tickets) * All civil cases (family law, probate, juvenile, and other civil cases) * Appeals of small claims cases and other civil cases worth $25,000 or less * Appeals of misdemeanor cases Appellate Courts There are two types of Appellate Courts: * Courts of Appeal * California Supreme Court There are 6 Courts of Appeal and one California Supreme Court. Courts of Appeal The Courts of Appeal are California's intermediate courts of review. District headquarters for the Courts of Appeal are located in: * First District: San Francisco * Second District: Los Angeles * Third District:Sacramento * Fourth District: San Diego (Division One) * Fifth District: Fresno * Sixth District:San Jose People who are not satisfied with a Trial Court decision can appeal their case in an Appellate Court. When they "appeal", they ask a higher-level court to change what the Trial Court decided. The role of the Courts of Appeal is not to give new trials, but to review the Superior Court record (court files and transcripts) to decide if legal errors were made.......

Words: 801 - Pages: 4

Court System

...United States and Mexico Court Systems “Court system the judiciary also known as the judicial system or judicature is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the sovereign or state” ( Freedman, 2000). The judiciary provides a mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Purposes and responsibilities of courts require balance between external and internal accountability. Courts do not serve their enduring purposes or continuing responsibilities unless their structure, governance, operations, programs, processes, and performance lead to the reality and deserved public perception that the judiciary is accountable. The courts’ responsibility for the proper use of public money is to ensure rule of law, equal protection and due process, individual justice in individual cases, and the appearance of individual justice in individual cases. In the United States, judicial branches of the federal and state governments are charged with the application and interpretation of the law. The U.S. court system is divided into two administratively separate systems: the federal and the state. Each of these systems are independent of the executive and legislative branches of government. Such a dual court system is a heritage of the colonial period. “By the time the U.S. Constitution had first mandated The Judiciary Act of 1789 the establishment of a federal judiciary, each of the original Thirteen Colonies already had its own comprehensive court system based on the......

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Law Letter for Tribunal Case

...Asia Ghaza 263 Woodpecker Road Islington , Tamworth TW3 4XC David Smith 69 Rocky Lane Northfield , Birmingham B14 J8C Dear Mr Smith, I am writing to you regarding your upcoming case for theft which you are currently on bail for. I know at the moment you are unsure on whether you should elect for the trial to be in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court. You have the decision in which court you would like your case heard. I'll explain the options that you can go through in this letter and then you can decide. Cases involving theft are treated as either way offences this means you can have the option to have your case heard in either the Magistrates or Crown court. In the Crown Court your case will be heard in front of a Jury who will make the final decision whereas the Magistrates Court your case will be heard infront of a judge who will also make the final decision on your sentencing. I will explain a bit more about both courts and also which one I think would be best for you to choose for your case. If you decided to have your case heard at the Crown Court you will present your case to 12 members of the Jury and they will make the final decision on whether you will be sentenced guilty or not guilty. The Jury is a selection of 12 jurors who are usually selected through the electoral. The Jury must be anonymous and must not know anyone involved in the case. A Juror must be at least 18 years old and can be no older than 70. They also would of had to been a UK......

Words: 1202 - Pages: 5

History of the International Criminal Court

...establishment of an international tribunal to judge political leaders accused of war crimes was first made during the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 by the Commission of Responsibilities. The issue was addressed again at conference held in Geneva under the League of Nations on 1–16 November 1937, but no practical results followed. The United Nations states that the General Assembly first recognized the need for a permanent international court to deal with atrocities of the kind committed during World War II in 1948, following the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals. At the request of the General Assembly, the International Law Commission drafted two statutes by the early 1950s but these were shelved as the Cold War made the establishment of an international criminal court politically unrealistic. Benjamin B. Ferencz, an investigator of Nazi war crimes after World War II and the Chief Prosecutor for the United States Army at the Einsatzgruppen Trial, one of the twelve military trials held by the U.S. authorities at Nuremberg, later became a vocal advocate of the establishment of an international rule of law and of an International Criminal Court. In his first book published in 1975, entitled Defining International Aggression-The Search for World Peace, he argued for the establishment of such an international court. The idea was revived in 1989 when A. N. R. Robinson, then Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago, proposed the creation of a permanent international court to deal with......

Words: 448 - Pages: 2

Supreme Court

... A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, instance court, judgment court, apex court, and highest court of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. However, not all highest courts are named as such. Civil law states do not tend to have singular highest courts. Additionally, the highest court in some jurisdictions is not named the "Supreme Court", for example, the High Court of Australia; this is because decisions by the High Court could formerly be appealed to the Privy Council. In a few places, the court named the "Supreme Court" is not in fact the highest court; examples include the New York Supreme Court, which is superseded by the New York Court of Appeals, and the former Supreme Court of Judicature of England and Wales. Some countries have multiple "supreme courts" whose respective jurisdictions have different geographical extents, or which are restricted to particular areas of law. In particular, countries with a federal system of government typically have both a federal supreme court, and supreme courts for each member state, with the former having jurisdiction over the latter only to the extent that the federal constitution......

Words: 4621 - Pages: 19


...Court Management Executive Summary Larry Garcia, Stephanie Saucedo, Erick Orozco, Alfred Grayson CJA/394 Jan-24-2012 Barry Boggle The traditional and “problem-solving” roles of the judge may be at odds philosophically, ethically, managerially, and Procedurally Communities expect more from courts for example, rehabilitation, reform, and control/cure of substance abuse and other behaviors and conditions. But some social problems cannot be solved. For example, mental health courts have proliferated as a result of federal funding. However, advocates point out that mental illness is not a crime and, in some instances, may be treatable but not curable. Likewise, domestic violence issues are complex; while courts can address some aspects and implement practices that will not exacerbate the problems; the general dynamics of domestic violence make the problem difficult for courts to solve. Long-term monitoring of substance abusers and sex offenders may be unworkable or unconstitutional (Chris Woodworth). “While the Purposes and Responsibilities of Courts Core Competency requires knowledge of and reflection upon theoretic concepts, their history and development over time, this competency is practical. The Purposes and Responsibilities Competency gives meaning to, in fact properly grounds, day-to-day judicial administration and the other nine Core Competencies. Absent knowledge of the judiciary’s enduring purposes and continuing responsibilities, court leaders, both judicial......

Words: 626 - Pages: 3

Treaties and Tribunals

...Treaties and Tribunals Judges and authorized persons investigate and make decisions on a certain affairs given to them using the same standards (Tribunals). A good example of this is when special international criminal tribunals that were established in Yugoslavia and Rwanda by the United Nations to prosecute the ones responsible for the atrocities which happen at war and genocide time. Another example to see what tribunal means is the trials of Saddam Hussein and the other Baath Party officials (Tribunals). Tribunals which are important part in the justice system make contributions in peoples’ lives. They deal with more than 500,000 cases a year. Some of the vulnerable cases are victims of crime, discrimination, treated unfair, persecution, and disputes about tax, employment, and benefit entitlement and they are managed by tribunals. Tribunals help the people recuperate the confidence that they can achieve justice when dealing with the federal, state and international levels. They need institutions that can empower them to work out their disagreements fairly, proportionately, and quickly. Tribunals help problems to be more manageable for the people. Tribunals are also important because two countries are so far away from each other and it helps make the relationship between two countries stronger because they are the checks and balances in the relationship between the two countries. Tribunals are also important to two are more countries because will hold people......

Words: 296 - Pages: 2