Should Car Owner Be More Taxed

In: Social Issues

Submitted By yanyuhannah
Words 254
Pages 2
Should private car owners be raxed for pollution?
Hannah 1312040112 When it comes to whether we should raise tax on those who possess the private car, some people oppsite this policy for defending their personal interests, yet others hold the view that it is a duty for owners to pay as trouble-makers. In fact, as the number of private car sharply increased, air pollution became more and more sever. For my part, I strongly support the latter viewpoint, and my reasons are as follows: For the car owners, to pay an extra tax seems to be a good way to undertake their responsibility. There is no doubt that the gas released from private cats largely contributes to serious environmental problems.If they easily got away from punishment, it is unfair for others. Moreover, putting a pollution tax is likely to raise owners' awareness of environment-protecting.When the car owners tend to choose public transportation, the private cars on the road will become less. Besides, some people who have been planning to purchase a car are likely to change their minds. For the fear of financial loss, potential consumer will probably take a wait-and-see attitude instead of putting that desire into action, which stops the tendency of increasing private cars. While banning privte car is impossible and unreasonable, to raise tax on private car owners should be vigorously popularized. To a great extent, this tactic is going to works because it takes different groups of the stakeholders into account.…...

Similar Documents

Should Smoking Be More Strict?

...Furthermore, to the public the contents of secondhand smoke contain dangerous carcinogens affecting the person’s health. Secondhand smoke is when a non-smoker breaths in nicotine and the other chemicals in a cigarette, cigar, or pipe that is exhaled by the smoker. The smoke going to fellow people causes more damage to their lungs by breathing it in. There has been claim stating that secondhand smoke is even more dangerous than smoking. Eliminating smoking will control the exposure people get from secondhand smoke, even if it was just a little exposure. Cigarettes pose a wide variety of health risks. Setting more regulations on smoking in public places will allow the reduction of risk factors to a minimum. Lastly, all smokers are at a risk for many health consequences of smoking. Smoking harms nearly all of the organs in the body. Cigarettes can contain over 1000 ingredients, which kills the body’s cells and systems of the human body. “During 1995-1999, smoking caused approximately 440,000 premature deaths in the United States annually” (Martin). Lung cancer and many forms of cancer may be contributed from smoking. A key ingredient that is in cigarettes that makes them more addictive is the inclusion of reconstituted tobacco. Smoking leads to the development of diseases. “Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult......

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

National Security Should Be More Important

...National Security Should Be More Important Enemy of the state depicts an evil NSA team conducting illegal surveillance on a labor lawyer Robert, who was supposed to have a videotape of a politically motivated murder. Robert’s life was peaceful and happy until he suddenly met his college friend Zavitz in a shop, who passed the videotape secretly to him. Ever since that moment, Robert’s life was turned upside down. A special team in NSA soon discovered that he might have the videotape, and then the team raided his house and planted surveillance devices in order to find the videotape. His every movement was tracked and every word was tapped, which destroyed Robert’s life: he was fired from his work, his bank accounts were frozen, his wife threw him out of home since photos about his meeting former girlfriend were sent to his wife. After stumbling around for a bit trying to figure out what's happening to him, Robert turned to Brill for help, who turns out be an ex-NSA agent and who was responsible for inventing some of the surveillance devices. Together, they fought the NSA using the same techniques used against them, and finally Robert got rid of all his accusation and went back to his peaceful life again. Although the plot of the movie might look like a little Hollywood style, the surveillance tools feathered in the movie, such as, phone wiretapping, Global Positioning System, voice and face recognition system, and some much advanced ones, are generally in use today.......

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

How and Why Should Parliament Be Made More Effective?

...How and why should parliament be made more effective? Parliament is the sovereign body in the United Kingdom and so it is vital, for the wellbeing of democracy, that parliament not only exists but is also effective. Parliament plays the role of the Legislative and, as a result, is required to be as effective as possible to assure that laws are well thought out, benefit the whole of society and most of all maintain democracy. However, many people feel that certain aspects within Parliament limit its effectiveness and they feel these features need to be reformed in order for Parliament to carry out its function correctly. Firstly, the most obvious way to make Parliament more effective would be to reform the electoral system. Currently, Westminster elections use the system of First-past-the-post where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the seats. However, this system is highly disproportionate in both terms of the word as it exaggerates winning votes for example, the Conservatives received 36.1% of the vote and won 47.1% of the seats in the 2010 general election, whereas it penalises small parties such as the Liberal Democrats who won 23% of the vote but gained only 8.8% of the seats. Particularly as FPTP produces landslide majorities, it makes Parliament less effective as the party that wins the general election forms the government and therefore has a large majority in most cases. If MPs belonging to the party vote along party lines all the time,......

Words: 1983 - Pages: 8

Should Cars Be More Efficient

...Should Cars be more efficient? David Hayes Dependence of man on the environment (SCI207) Jacqueline Poole March 4, 2013 There are many things that have gone into shaping the society we live in today. The fabric of our culture has changed and changed again in response to new additions which have woven their way into our lives. But, none has affected our society as deeply as the automobile. From the way we work and play to how we design the buildings we call home, the automobile has created in many ways a car culture with its own status symbols. However, while the automobile has changed the lives of us all in a positive light; this does comes with a price, and the price is our environment. Currently “cars and other highway vehicles continue to emit some 60 million tons of carbon monoxide per year. Motor vehicles also emit as much as 50 percent of our carcinogenic and toxic air pollutants, such as benzene and formaldehyde. And heavy vehicles, particularly diesel-powered buses and freight trucks, constitute a significant source of soot and other unhealthy fine particles that, when inhaled, lodge in and damage human tissue.” (Turk, J & Bensel, T 4.3) In this paper, I am going to debate why cars should be made more efficient for the sake of saving the environment in which we live in. I will then give the different options as to how cars can be built to be more efficient; and then, debate as to why these options would not be a wise decision for some. Even with all the......

Words: 1353 - Pages: 6

Why the Government Should Subsidize Hybrid Cars

...Why the Government Should Subsidize Hybrid Cars In the midst of an economic recovery and an energy crisis, the United States of America is at the brink of much political debate. One major political dispute arises as to whether or not hybrid cars should be subsidized. According to our research, the economy would be more sustainable and prosperous if the government subsidized the purchase of and research and development of hybrid vehicles. The sales of hybrid cars have steadily declined by 53% within the past year, which is rather detrimental to society. Incentives to buy hybrid cars are too insignificant because technology has not yet been able to produce them at affordable prices. Subsidies should be provided because positive externalities are not accurately reflected in the cost. America desperately needs to create solid energy policies in order to thrive domestically and internationally. With an inadequate amount of attention directed towards environmental and energy issues, America should embrace hybrid vehicles in order to reduce our consumption of foreign oil, thwart the threat of global warming, and implement innovative techniques to use energy more efficiently. To support our findings, we will explore the negative externalities associated with a petroleum-based economy and emphasize the magnitude of environmental benefits that could be reached with more hybrid vehicles. Further we will use economic analysis to justify that the implementation of these......

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Why Gun Ownership Should Be Held More Strictly:

...Farah English 3 Part 2: Why gun ownership should be held more strictly: I, Omar Farah, certify that I have personally completed this assignment based on my own personal efforts. I understand if I use outside sources, I must properly give my source(s) credit using the APA format and my paper should not include more than 20% of direct quotes from other sources. I understand if I do not provide proper credit to outside sources, I will be documented for plagiarism and be required to resubmit a new assignment. I will not divulge the content of this assignment or any of my work, generally or specifically, to any current or future James Madison High School students. 1/4/2015 I chose the topic “Why gun ownership should be held more strictly” because most of our daily news flashes say at least someone was shot and killed or shot and injured. I don’t like this; it is senseless and very sad. We are losing people every day, because someone is using their gun recklessly or leaving it where someone else has access or easily found. I don’t get why people kill people it is just inhumane and against our morals. Guns have very high danger to our country as well as other countries. That is why I pick or chose to write about this topic for my persuasive essay because that is what I see in guns and want people to see it too. I have one question to my reader; do you think guns should be under a stricter law? Honestly, I believe that we should have more stringent gun laws that tell people;......

Words: 894 - Pages: 4

Should Referendums Be Used More in the Uk

...be used to help promote political participation by enabling the electorate to become better educated and informed and therefore reduce the feeling of alienation. By providing people with the opportunity to participate in referendums they are presented with the opportunity to educate and inform themselves on political issues. There is clearly a link between an informed electorate and higher levels of political participation. This correlation arises from the fact that a more politically educated electorate is able understand the workings of government, and the issues affecting them; therefore seek to bring about change. Switzerland was one of the first countries to introduce referendums to make decisions on proposed legislation. Although turnout figures in Switzerland are not very high, around 45%, it can be argued that the Swiss people are more politically active than turnout figures show due to the fact that there is such a large number of referendums not everyone votes in all of them, and also that they are more involved with political parties and in other ways than most other countries. Aside from elections there are very few ways in which citizens can directly influence political decisions. There are provisions in most democratic countries for the electorate to have some personal contact with their representative, however for the most part people do not make use of this tool because they believe it to be ineffectual; issues raised in these arenas rarely have an effect......

Words: 860 - Pages: 4

Should Mary Wollstonecraft and Hannah More Be Defined as Feminists?

...Should Mary Wollstonecraft and Hannah More be defined as feminists? Like any ideology, there is not a defining answer as to what feminism means. The Oxford English Dictionary defines feminism as the “advocacy of equality of the sexes and the establishment of the political, social, and economic rights of the female sex”. The term ‘feminist’ itself has been used in the United Kingdom since the 1880s but it’s philosophy had been dated back centuries before. Since then it’s meaning has evolved into different branches from radical feminism to liberal feminism for example, and is used on a political platform. It is fact that both Mary Wollstonecraft and Hannah More are examples of women who philosophised about women’s rights and their place in society. They both produced published works discussing women in society focused upon educational reform, and many have debated the extent to which they should be considered feminists. However, although their views contradicted each other, based on the modern day definition of feminism, both Wollstonecraft and More should be considered feminists for numerous reasons. Firstly, it is indisputable that Mary Wollstonecraft was a feminist and even as far to be considered as the “founder of western feminism”. In Wollstonecraft’s writings, a new female value is consciously introduced and effectively infused into a movement across the late eighteenth century. There are many books that focus on Wollstonecraft’s thought alone as they all depict the......

Words: 2199 - Pages: 9

Should Referendums Be More Widely Used in the Uk?

...Should referendums be more widely used in the UK? Referendums are a type of direct democracy used in Britain that involve the public directly voting on a single issue in order to make a political decision. This essay will argue that referendums shouldn’t be more widely used in the UK. Many may argue that referendums should be more widely used in the UK because they are a pure form of direct democracy originating from Ancient Greece; they allow the people to rule and make decisions for themselves. A recent example of this is the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence, which allowed Scotland’s people to choose whether they wanted to remain part of the UK. However, according to the British constitution and the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, referendums cannot be binding. So, in theory, if the result of this referendum had been “yes”, David Cameron has the authority to go against it— no matter how unlikely Cameron actually doing this is. Even if the people vote with an overwhelming majority on an issue, parliament always has the authority to overrule the referendum’s result thus making them much l ess useful a tool in democracy and wider use of them much less advisable. Others might insist that higher usage of referendums would improve political participation in Britain, as is the case in California, where citizen- initiated referendums (or “propositions” as there are known in the US) are held regularly to help make political......

Words: 658 - Pages: 3

Should Referendums Be More Widely Used in the Uk?

...25 marker Should referendums be more widely used in the UK? A referendum is a popular vote where the people are asked to determine an important political or constitutional issue directly. They have a yes or no answer so the result isn’t indecisive. A relatively recent example of a referendum in the UK was the ‘adoption of the Alternative Vote for UK general elections’ in 2011. The turnout of this referendum was 32.1% yes and 67.9 no. Referendums are held because of the concern with important constitutional changes or amendments. They are used as a way to entrench a change, whatever the outcome of the referendum the new governments and parliaments will not be able to reverse the changes unless they consult the people again; the changes will become permanent. There are many benefits to using referendums more widely in the UK. Firstly because the public’s views on a particular question are clearly represented. It helps to make decisions legitimate and confirms the principle of government by consent. An example of this would be the Northern Ireland Good Friday agreement in 1998. Where the referendum was massively important, and too succeeds it needed a widespread and clear support from most of the community. The ‘yes’ vote was over 70% and was therefore crucial. Using more referendums in the UK could also prevent the governments from making unpopular decisions. There are many positives to why we should use referendums more widely just like there are negatives. Some......

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Should the European Government Take in More Immigrants?

...At the moment there is a lot of press about how much support European countries should be giving to asylum seekers and refugees due to the crisis in Syria but it is also important to discuss the larger role of immigrants coming to Europe and whether European nations should be allowing a larger number into their borders. Taking the UK as an example it could seem obvious to people that with already a housing shortage with only 100 000 new houses being built every year, when according to university research to cope with an ever growing population 240 000 new homes are needed each year allowing a large number of immigrants in doesn't make sense. In fact the governor of the Bank of England, complained that housebuilding in the UK was half that of his native Canada, despite the UK having a population twice the size. The common metaphor of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole could be applied to these facts. There are also some more ignorant arguments often heard against immigration. One of these is that many immigrants are coming to the country to claim benefits. In fact immigrants are less likely to with only 7% of immigrants claiming some sort of benefits compared to 15% of working age Britons. Regarding wages there is no evidence that immigrants bring down the average wages of a country but figures do show that for low-skilled jobs immigrants keep the wages low. Although yearly figures show that the populations in European countries are expanding the rate of......

Words: 470 - Pages: 2

Should the Western World Accept More Refugees?

...Should the western world accept more refugees? For: 1. For protecting democracy or combating convicts (such as ISIS), most of the western countries have military actions in Middle-East, leading up to the current turmoil. Thus, they have the obligation to help the refugees. -After 911, America launched the Iraq War, and overthrew the Hussein regime. They supported the Shia government, which is the majority in Iraq, but also caused the rebellions from Sunni. The invasion of the US caused local activists turn into a radical group which is called ISIS currently. Their sphere of influence include Syria, which is one of the main reasons that caused the current turmoil in this country. - While the western countries, waving the flag of justice, is having battle with ISIS. They are, simultaneously, putting the people in disturbance. For their safety and future, the refugees have no choice but to escape to other regions. 2. The second or third generation of Muslims in the western nations are not accepted by the local society, so they turn to their religion for recognition. -In the western nations , there are many the second or third generation of Muslims who make quite an effort to assimilate to the local society, but due to their religion, in vain. To them, Muslim immigrants could not acquire the local recognition; hence, religion is the way for them to pursue the identification. Thus, a large portion of the ISIS is consisted of these people from western world, and the western...

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Public Organisations Should Be More Business-Like

...Public organisations should be more business-like. Introduction There is no lacking of support in the society advocating that public organisations should be heading towards into a manner that is more business-like, in other words, to adopt the business model that private companies operate. However, there are also people in the public suggests that the public sector should keep its operating model for public and private organisations are operating to achieve different goals in the society. This article is aimed to examine whether organisations in the public arena should be run more business-like through situational examination, literature reviews and detail market analysis. In this paper, the author will discuss the difference between the public sector and the private companies in terms of business objectives, the uniqueness of public services offer by the public sector before the discussion of whether public organisations should run more business-like. Public Sector Vs Private companies By their very nature, public and private sector businesses are very different organisations operating to fulfil different objectives. The public sector has public accountability and therefore institutions in this sector is usually are owned and operated by the government. Organisations operate in the public sector, for example, the Royal New Zealand Police is under a mandate to provide a public service to safeguard the safety and wellbeing of the residents in New Zealand. The service is...

Words: 1207 - Pages: 5

Tom Jones, Owner of Tom’s Used Cars

...spend. TO: Tom Jones, Owner of Tom’s Used Cars DATE: 7/26/2011 SUBJECT: Analysis of asking car prices (Used Mustangs) Please find below the results of the analysis of the asking prices of used cars with different characteristics. Introduction Buying cars is one of the most critical things in our life. We need to research different categories before we spend our dollars, and we must establish buying guides. Examples of the buying guides are: 1) I have to know exactly how 2) I have to know what car I want and what car meet my criteria. These guides will help us decide how much you can afford to spend, whether you should look at a fancy car or regular car, whether you should look at car with grand tourer (GT) or without grand tourer, style, transmission type and a myriad of other factors. The borderline that we agreed on as a team is the car reliability, quality, performance, and power. On this specific case study we would like to study several variables and research these variables effects. The car price, which is the car age, odometer reading in miles, type of the transmission, the number of cylinders in the engine, if there is air conditioner in the car or not, the car’s color, determine if it is GT model. Lastly, the last variable is to see if the price is determined if it is a private owner or dealer owner. We would first like to provide general information and definitions to some of these variables: Mileage Affects Prices: Used car prices tend to be......

Words: 1762 - Pages: 8

Should College Be More Tax Supported?

...RUNNING HEAD: College be more tax supported Should college be more tax supported? Jermaine Coble English 120 Dr. Sonya Brown February 17, 2009 As a student at Fayetteville State University you will pay $8,000 a year for tuition. For four years at this university, you will pay around $32,000, which is a lot of money. However, if you chose to enroll at the University of Chapel Hill, tuition would be $15,040 a year. For four years, you would pay around $60,160. (UNC 2008) This is a lot of money. Most people have to take loans out to pay for college and when they graduate they are already in debt to banks. Now, think about how the first thirteen year of your education was paid for by taxes and the government. The government should just pay for four more year. Are programs like Pell Grant working to help lower our tuition? What does our former president and president think about the topic? We go through thirteen years of free public education or what seemed to be free. According to The Washington Post, it cost on an average $8,322 a year for one child to go to public school. For a senior in high school tax payer have spent on an average of $108,186 on one child. If taxes pay for thirteen years of public schooling, why not pay for four more years of higher education at state supported colleges? The cost of college would be cheaper for tax payers’ then public school because only about three fifths of high school seniors who graduate from high school actually...

Words: 1619 - Pages: 7