Ford Motor Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By pudder
Words 1783
Pages 8
Ford Motor Case Study

Table of Contents
Executive Summary 3
Introduction 4
Issue Identification 5
Environmental and Root Cause Analysis 6
Alternatives and Options 8
Recommendations 10
Implementation 11
Monitor and Control 12
Exhibits 13

Executive Summary
After reviewing Ford Motor supply chain, we became aware of its very complex nature. Due to this complexity we are forced to search for alternatives to overcome the costly supply chain challenges faced by our industry both now and in the future. The present system has an inefficient control of a large database and a vast and complex network of suppliers.
We need to change our supply chain in order to make it more cost effective and profitable. After careful analysis we recommend the implementation of a partial virtual integration system, similar to the system used by Dell Computers. With this system, Ford will use information technology and the internet to interact and transact with both their suppliers and their customers. Ford can increase their sales by providing better customer service and faster communication from the supply end through to the manufacturing division and right on to their end user, the customer.
This system will be implemented with their existing supply chain so Ford will cover both markets at the same time. If Ford concentrated only on the virtual system their competition would put them out of business, so by running both systems simultaneously will give them an edge over their competition.

Ford Motor Company is the second largest industrial corporation in the world with revenues of more than $144 billion and about 370,000 employees. Their operations span more than 200 countries worldwide. The company has both the design and manufacturing of cars division and they have a…...

Similar Documents

Ford Motor Company Case Study

...------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Ford Motor Company Case Report ------------------------------------------------- Executive Summary Ford Motor Company has a long history, starting in Michigan in 1903. They have focused on designing and manufacturing and have been very successful, however with increasing competition, global markets and over-capacity the company needs to look at ways to improve profitability. The company has implemented various programs and processes to create a lean, responsive system with better consumer forecasting. Their challenge is to continue to research ways to stay viable in current market and industry conditions. Dell Computers has been very successful with a direct model and virtual integration that may or not work well for Ford. CONTENTS * ISSUE 3 * ANALYSIS 4 * ALTERNATIVES 6 * RECOMMENDATIONS 7 * IMPLEMENTATION 8 * CONCLUSION 8 * REFERENCES 9 * ISSUE: The Ford Motor Company is facing a number of challenges including the direction of CEO Jac Nasser to focus on customer responsiveness and shareholder value to deal with increasing competitiveness, an industry with potential over-capacity and the expansion into globalized markets. Ford had begun to implement systems to reduce cycle-time, improve quality and to lower costs. Programs included consolidating product development into five Vehicle Centres (VCs),......

Words: 1689 - Pages: 7

Ford Motor Company Case Analysis

...Ford Motor Company Case Study Introduction and Background The world-renowned automobile organization, Ford Motor Company, located in Dearborn, Michigan, has recently taken on a new CEO. This CEO has changed many things drastically in a short amount of time, including many positive things but also has implemented a few negative changes. Even with the drastic changes, the company still lost billions of dollars in the first three years under the new CEO’s reign, though the third year saw fewer losses than the second year. The CEO must deal with and must overcome many issues, internally as well as externally, to help the company get back on its feet and begin making profit again. Facts The new CEO has been employed at Ford for three years now, and is known for taking Boeing Airlines from suffering huge losses to making huge profits. Ford Motor Company took him on as a means to turn around losses and provide the company with new guidance. The company certainly took on a new direction, with one of the first acts being to bring back the Ford Taurus into the line and dropping truck and SUV production by forty percent. However not all changes were positive, as 46,000 jobs were cut. This decision was made to attempt to consolidate the company’s expenses as the company borrowed $23 billion but has already spent almost $15 billion of it, with no way of paying it back anytime soon. Issues The company is not only suffering considerable losses financially, but is......

Words: 1075 - Pages: 5

Ford Motor Company Case Study

...virtual integration direct business model that has been used by Dell. Through this model, Ford will use the emerging information technologies and internet as well as new ideas from high tech industries in order to interact and transact with their suppliers and end users. Furthermore, Ford can boost its sales by providing better customer service and by having faster communication between suppliers, manufacturers, and customers in the value chain. This proposed system will have to run concurrently with the existing supply chain so that Ford will cover both market segments at the same time. Since Dell and Ford are two different types of industries, one is in computer manufacturing and the other is in auto industry, it does not seem right for Ford to implement exactly the same "virtual integration model" as Dell. In fact, if Ford implements the full direct business model alone and abolished its existing supply chain then Ford will certainly run into a high risk of losing their business to competitors due to the fact that customers want to test and feel the car before they buy it for a large amount of money. On the other hand, when customers buy computers on line they don’t have to worry about touching and testing the computer, all they require is a better price than the retail shops and the product’s specs are according to their needs. Part 2 Fundamental Issue The fundamental issue for Ford is the management and control of their large database of their business partners,......

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Ford Motor Company Pinto Case

...Ford Motor Company Pinto Case Karen Nollet, Alonso Miller, Michael Morra, Pamela Tenori MGT/216 Abstract In 1971, Ford Motor Company (FMC), on the advice of then vice-president Lee Iacocca, introduced the first subcompact vehicle, the Ford Pinto. After production, Ford discovered a defect in the design on the fuel system; the gas tank was placed in the rear of the vehicle. This error could cause the vehicle to explode on low speed rear end collisions. Ford conducted a risk/analysis to determine whether to recall the vehicles or leave the situation as is and suffer the consequences as they arise. After concluding that the vehicles could be modified for $11 per vehicle, Ford decided not to recall the vehicles. Based on their risk/analysis the cost to recall the vehicles sold would be $137 million, Ford determined that it would be more profitable to leave the vehicles as is and pay out costs in lawsuits because this figure adjusted to $49.5 million, substantially lower than the cost to recall the product. Ethics and morals would appear to be ignored for profit and gain. Ford Motor Company Pinto Case Ford Motor Company Mission Statement (1996), “We are a global family with a proud heritage......

Words: 1118 - Pages: 5

Ford Motor Case

...Executive Summary Ford Motor Company started in Michigan in 1903. They have focused on designing and manufacturing and have been very successful, however with increasing competition, global markets and over-capacity the company needs to look at ways to improve profitability. Their challenge is to continue to research ways to stay viable in current market and industry conditions. Dell Computers has been very successful with a direct model and virtual integration. However, since Dell and Ford are two different types of industries, one is in computer manufacturing and the other is in auto industry, it does not seem right for Ford to implement exactly the same "virtual integration model" as Dell. Realizing an urgent need to modify their supply chain in order to make it more cost effective and more profitable, and after careful analysis of the whole situation, I have recommended the partial implementation and execution of the virtual integration direct business model that has been used by Dell. Through this model, Ford will use the emerging information technologies and internet as well as new ideas from high tech industries in order to interact and transact with their suppliers and end users. Furthermore, Ford can boost its sales by providing better customer service and by having faster communication between suppliers, manufacturers, and customers in the value chain. By measuring the performance of this model, Ford should schedule periodical review and evaluation meetings.......

Words: 1861 - Pages: 8

Ford Motor Case Study

...Executive Summary: Ford wanted to adapt the idea of virtual integration to improve its supply chain. By the use of technology; it wanted to reduce its working capital and increase profits. Moreover, the company was emphasizing more and more on shareholder value and customer responsiveness so they were looking into reengineering some of their processes which can help improve their current forecasting model and reduce OTD cycle times substantially. With new business models prevailing, Ford did not want to be left behind; they were looking at high-tech industry’s growth in the recent years and thought if they could implement some these ideas to their business. Ford has always been a forerunner in employing technology to overcome its constraints of information flow between its global manufacturing sites, they wanted to implement a similar I.T solution to get the better of its suppliers. But having such a large supplier base was making it difficult to manage; then they looked at high tech industry’s leading player DELL who was not only growing phenomenally every year but was also successful in building proximity to both its suppliers and customers. A comparative analysis of Ford and Dell’s SCM operation helps understand the differences in their organizational models and find strategies that could be applied for Ford’s success. Different areas like supplier management, sales, inventory management and customer experience have been compared to identify the bottlenecks in Ford’s......

Words: 1307 - Pages: 6

Case Study Ford Motor Company

...CASE STUDY Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company, one of the world’s largest automotive manufacturers, has worked with Penske on several Six Sigma initiatives. As its lead logistics provider (LLP), Penske’s quality team of associates are trained in Six Sigma practices and work closely with Ford to streamline operations and create and maintain a more centralized logistics network. Together, they uncovered several areas for real cost savings as a result of reducing inbound carrier discrepancies, eliminating unnecessary premium costs and reducing shipment overages. Plus, Penske implemented accountability procedures and advanced logistics management technologies to gain more visibility of its overall supply network. Six Sigma initiatives streamline operations Penske Logistics began its relationship with Ford as lead logistics provider (LLP) for Ford’s assembly plant in Norfolk, Va. At the time, each of Ford’s 20 North American assembly plants managed its own logistics operations. A decentralized approach provided total control of logistics at the plant level, but presented costly redundancies in materials handling and transportation. Ford conducted studies to determine the benefits of transitioning the company’s decentralized logistic operations to a centralized approach. The decision was quickly apparent – centralization of the company’s logistics operations would increase both velocity and visibility throughout the network, as well as reduce supply chain costs. Shortly......

Words: 1468 - Pages: 6

Supply Chain Strategy - Case Study --Ford Motor Company

...Company and Industry background The Ford Motor Company (Ford) is an American multinational automaker headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan. It was founded by Henry Ford and incorporated on June 16, 1903. The company sells automobiles and commercial vehicles under the Ford brand and most luxury cars under the Lincoln brand. Also Ford owns Brazilian SUV manufacturer Troller, and Australian performance car manufacturer FPV. Ford has stakes in Mazda of Japan, Aston Martin of the United Kingdom, and Jiangling of China. Ford also has a number of joint-ventures in China, Thailand, Turkey and Russia. Ford's former UK subsidiaries Jaguar and Land Rover were sold to Tata Motors. Ford also owned the Swedish automaker Volvo for a period of time. Ford discontinued the Mercury brand, under which it had marketed entry-level luxury cars in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and the Middle. Ford is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is controlled by the Ford family. It is described by Forbes as "the most important industrial company in the history of the United States. Ford introduced methods for large-scale manufacturing of cars and large-scale management of an industrial workforce using elaborately engineered manufacturing sequences typified by moving assembly lines; by 1914 these methods were known around the world as Fordism. In 1985 Ford had embarked on an ambitious restructuring plan called Ford 2000, which included merging its North American, European and international......

Words: 2635 - Pages: 11

Ford Motors Case

...Background Ford Motor Company was founded by Henry Ford and 11 investors in 1903. The company is based out of Dearborn, Michigan. Ford Motors is a worldwide company, with 335,000 employees, operating in 25 countries and on six continents. Ford changed the way cars were made with their innovative assembly production methods. Having gone public in 1956, the company grew to become the world’s largest truck manufacturer and the second largest total automotive manufacturer. In addition to manufacturing cars and trucks, they are involved in producing components/systems and are engaged in financing and rentals. Ford experienced significant growth derived from company acquisitions. The acquisitions leading up to 2000 consisted of Hertz Co., Jaguar, Volvo, and Land Rover. Auto industry sales are sensitive to the economic cycle. Echoing this notion, Ford’s sales tend to experience volatility during times of economic recessions and booms. In these turbulent times, the company has a high variability of cash on hand and equity market value. In 1999, Ford had a net income of $7.2 billion (approximate 4.5% profit margin), and revenues of $162.6 billion. Ford’s automotive segment accounts for 85% of total revenue. Their US car and truck sales are responsible for 24.1% of the total market share. As of 2000, Ford had 1.15 billion common shares of stock and 70.9 million shares of Class B stock. Among these two shares, the Ford family held all Class B shares, which gave them special......

Words: 1858 - Pages: 8

Ford Case Study

...Case Study of Ford Motor Co. Executive Summary Ford Motor Co. was second largest automobile company in the word, with revenue $.144 billion and more than 370,000 employee (in 1996), with extended operations to 200 countries. Ford dealing with a huge number (thousands) of suppliers and dealers in daily basis, which create high level of complexity combined with other internal and external factors have pushed Ford to search for solutions in order to overcome the costly supply chain challenges that they are facing and may continue to face in the future if they didn't find a proper solution . the main issues with their current system is: the inefficient control of their large data base and complex network of suppliers, the existence of independent distributors and their inability to communicate and serve their customers directly. Ford realized that they should modify their supply chain in order to make it more cost effective and more profitable, in order to solve this issue for launched a full organization re-structures business process plan called (FORD 2000), by segmenting their market to 5 Vehicles Centers (VCs) for product development activates, each (VC) was responsible about for developing of vehicles in a particular customer market, By partly adapting the virtual integration direct business model of Dell Co., Ford can use the emerging information technologies and internet as well as new ideas from high tech industries in order to interact and transact with......

Words: 1853 - Pages: 8

Case Analysis of Ford Motor Company

...2. Discuss Mulally’s leadership style at Ford Motor Company and provide examples of how his actions fit this style. Mulally’s leadership style at the Ford Motor Company is participative. He encourages the employees to participate, but retain the final say over the decision-making process. Employees feel engaged in the process and are more motivated and creative. Based on the case study, Mulally feels that communication is essential. For example, Mulally states, “Everyone has to know the plan, its status, and areas that need special attention” (Organizational Leadership, p. 544). Mulally offers guidance to the employees, but he also participates with the employees and allow input from the employees. A symbol of this can be taken from the meeting room setup. Mulally holds Thursday Morning meetings around a circular dark wood table that seats 18 executives. Mulally sits in the perimeter in a seat labeled as the “Pilot’s seat”. Obviously, Mulally believes in “round table” discussions. Round table discussions are important to a business because this gives employees involved a sense of belonging and being heard. It opens the lines of communication. Mulally feels that the only way an issue can be resolved is to be honest by bringing it to the forefront. He believes in clear visibility versus “sweeping thing under the rug”. In addition, Mulally believes in the “One Company” mentality. He adopted the “One Ford” definition of the company. Mulally......

Words: 1299 - Pages: 6

Ford Motor Company Case Analysis

...Ford Motor Company (Case Analysis) Group #6- TGAA TTH 1:00 Member 1- Taylor O’Neill Member 2- Knyra Ratcliff Member 3- Alex Perkins Member 4- Xu Han Member 5- Kevin Carter Member 6- Alex Dundon/ Nick Tran Presentation Date: 11/17/15 Introduction Our group has chosen Ford Motor Company as our case analysis subject. Ford is an American multinational automaker and was founded by Henry Ford in 1903. Ford Motor Company is the second largest automaker in the United States and is also the fifth largest automaker in the world. Throughout the paper we will be sharing background information of the company such as the vision statement, mission statement, company history, the industry, and our company’s strategy. We will also be sharing the elements of Ford’s internal and external environment (includes historical and competitor financial information), problem statements, possible alternative solutions to those problems, and our recommendations as to which alternative solutions would be best used in response to the problems at hand. Towards the end of our case analysis on Ford Motor Company there is a visual present for both the SWOT analysis and the grand strategy matrix. We have provided appropriate and significant content in completion of this case analysis. Background Vision Statement “To become the world's leading Consumer Company for automotive products and services. (Homepage, 2015)” Mission Statement “One Team. People working together as a lean, global......

Words: 5526 - Pages: 23

Ford Motor Company Case Study

...Ford Motor Company Case Study Executive Summary The Ford motor company has been a progressive leader throughout the history of the company. In order maintain this leadership, it has had to adapt to the ever changing business environment and market conditions. With the emergence of new information technologies and ideas from new high-tech industries, it must evaluate how these tools can be utilized to further the business. Recently, virtual integration has been proven very successful to companies like Dell and Cisco. However, this approach is best suited for companies that have very few layers of suppliers as well as more centralized production. The Ford motor company cannot simply change their entire supply chain to fit this model. That being said, some of these theories and practices can still be incorporated into Ford’s current supply chain. These must be calculated changes, involving various departments within Ford’s organization, collaborating with their most valued and dynamic suppliers. With Ford already moving somewhat toward this direction with suppliers who provide complete subsystems for their automobiles, further changes in these areas should prove feasible with limited risk. Issues • Determining whether or not to incorporate the virtual integration model used by other recently successful firms such as Cisco and Dell • Uncertainty on how to utilize emerging information technologies to interact with......

Words: 1042 - Pages: 5

Alan Mullay, Ceo, Ford Motor Company, Case Study

...Case Study Alan Mullay, CEO, Ford Motor Company “Alan Mulally, CEO, Ford Motor Company” Ford Motor Company was started in 1903 in Detroit, Michigan, by Henry Ford. 2006 brought a tremendous change to the multinational automobile producer, when Alan Mulally came to the head of line to lead Ford into a new era. In the past several years, Ford has been in danger of failing, causing a shift in its global position and a restructure of its company portfolio. Ford has become a global competitor with brands including Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Aston Martin, Jaguar, and Land Rover. Mulally was welcomed to his new position with a financial crisis waiting on his desk. Although never working in the auto industry, Mulally had a plan to manage Ford out of the economic down spiral it had it found itself with the foreseeable economic challenges of the entire US economy. Ford has reported losses for the pass several years. * Lost of $12.6 billion in 2006 * Lost of $2.7 billion in 2007 * Lost of $14.7 billion in 2008 * Lost of $1.4 billion in 2009 (first quarter) (Hellriegel, 2011) Mulally created more debt to make up the shortages by borrowing to keep Ford from government bailouts. Under the Mullaly reconstruction, Ford will discontinue the Mercury line in 2010 year end, maintained a stake in Mazda and Aston Martin and sold off subsidiaries Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo within the last two years. While realizing the loses and selling of part of their......

Words: 1093 - Pages: 5

Case Study - Ford Motor Company

...Introduction Ford Motor Company was founded in 1903 by Henry Ford and eleven business associates. The company was responsible for the innovation of the moving assembly line where employees would remain in the same place while performing the same task on each automobile that move along the assembly line. Ford Motor Company has been a prominent car producer for over 100-years – an icon of U.S. manufacturing. However, the company has reached a pivotal impasse where timely planning has become crucial. Hence, to reestablish the brand and Henry Ford’s original vision to produce “cars that were affordable to the masses” (What Would You Do? Ford Motor Company, n.d. p. 1). This case study will examine four options; the first option is whether to close down older plants in an effort to realign production and sales. The second option is to re-engineer the company to produce smaller cars eliminating or sharply reducing the SUV and truck lines. The third option is to take the unprecedented step of dramatically reducing North American presence and focus the company efforts on international markets where the company has been very successful. The fourth option is to sell the entire Premier Automotive Group (PAG). To determine what the criterion for the Ford Motor Company four options are, Ford’s management team should collectively utilize the rational-decision making model that is define as “a systematic process in which managers define problems, evaluate alternatives, and......

Words: 1693 - Pages: 7