Examine the Reasons for Changing Patterns of Marriage and Divorce

In: Social Issues

Submitted By missnonymouse
Words 265
Pages 2
Examine the reasons for changing patterns of marriage and divorce in the UK
Over the last fifty years the patterns of marriage and divorce have changed. There are many reasons why they have changed. One of the reasons may be the changes in the law, which now allow women to appeal for divorce and makes it easier for couples to get divorced in general, people have high expectations, women’s roles in society have changed, the family has become privatized, and the increased life expectancy. These are just a few of the factors that contribute to the changing patterns of marriage and divorce.
In 2006 the divorce rate fell for a second consecutive year (by seven percent). The divorce rate has been falling for years as less people are getting married and changes in the laws regarding marriage and divorce as well as changing attitudes in society are all factors that are contributing to this.
One of the reasons for this is society no longer frowned upon by society. Until recently divorce was looked down on and considered a dark topic, divorcees particularly female divorcees found themselves alienated from society and struggled to support themselves and any children they may have had. However now divorce is accepted in societies and divorcees are offered support and if they want to can even get married again if they wish to do so.
Another reason why the divorce and marriage patterns are changing is womens roles in society have changed. Previously women were expected to be housewives and homemakers. However now women have various roles in society, women…...

Similar Documents

Examine Reasons for Change in Divorce Rate Since 1970

...Examine the reasons for changes in divorce rate since 1970 Since the 1960’s divorce rate began to increase dramatically but the biggest rise in divorce rate was in 1972 when it doubled and was 120,000. The divorce rate continued to rise and in 1993 reached its peak at 180,000. There has been explanations for the rise in divorce which are: secularisation, changes in law, divorce had become cheaper and also changing attitudes in society especially with women as they had begun to receive more rights. By the times divorce had become a lot more socially acceptable. In the 19th Century divorce was extremely difficult to obtain, more so for women. Eventually in 1923 grounds were equalised for men and women, but this was followed by a sharp rise in the number of divorce petitions from women. Again in 1972, the grounds widened to ‘irretrievable breakdown’ which made divorce easier to obtain and produced a doubling of the divorce rate overnight. The introduction of legal aid for divorce cases in 1949 lowered the cost of divorce. With each change in the law divorce rates have risen. The new right are against the introduction of new laws which make marriage easier as it breaks up the idea of a traditional family which they support. It lead to a trend in single parent households. There were many laws which helped divorce become a lot cheaper and easier to obtain, the most significant law put in place in examining the reasons for changes in divorce rate is the law which was passed in......

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

Examine the Reasons for Changes in the Patterns of Marriage and Co-Habitation in the Last 40 Years [24]

...Examine the reasons for changes in the patterns of marriage and co-habitation in the last 40 years. [24] Marriage is traditionally conceived to be a legally recognized relationship between two consenting adults that carries certain rights and obligations. Cohabitation is an arrangement whereby couples who are not legally married live together in partnership within the common law. Cohabitation has now become a very common way of living. The patterns of marriage have varied quite significantly. Statistics show that in 1972, the number of couples (480,000) near the Second World War got married. The reason for this was because of the baby boom generated in 1950s reaching the marriageable age and these people choosing to marry at a younger age. Women were getting married at the age of 22 and men at the age of 24. Recently, the trend of getting married went into decline, in 2005, only 284,000 couples got married. Also, in comparison to 1972, men were getting married at the age of 31 and women at the age of 29 in 2004, showing that the trend was decreasing and the age of marriage was slowly increasing. Wilkinson (1994) suggests reasons as to why the trend in marriage has dropped so significantly. He notes that women are going through a ‘genderquake’ suggesting a radical change to the female attitude towards marriage and family life. She argues that young females no longer prioritize marriage and children; this could be due to there being more opportunities for women within......

Words: 1058 - Pages: 5

Examine the Patterns of, and Reasons for, Domestic Violence in Society.

...Examine the patterns of, and reasons for, domestic violence in society. Domestic violence can come in different forms: physical, psychological, sexual or financial violence. These take place within the family or intimate relationships. Common views on domestic violence view this as behaviour from disturbed or ‘sick’ individuals, caused by psychological problems. However, this is challenged by sociologists. The issue is far too widespread to only have an effect on a few ‘psycho’ people. Statistics show that 1/6 of all violent crimes are domestic violence. This is a crime which is underestimated by many; official statistics cannot prove how much it occurs because of victims unwilling to report these crimes out of fear or thought not to be a problem the authority can solve. If victims are willing to report these crimes, police and prosecutors may be reluctant to record them. This may be because agencies are not prepared to involve themselves in domestic cases as the family is a private sphere, and the government is very male dominated therefore cases that may affect the males reputation might not be recorded to ruin it. It is more likely for women to be the victim, men wanting to be dominant within the household, in control, to have a sense of power and authority. 1 out of 4 women have been assaulted by their partner once where as 1 out of 8 has been continuously. Dobash suggests violence is set off by the male partner being challenged, that their sense of power is at risk....

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Examine the Reasons for a Change in Divorce Rate Since 1971

...Examine the reasons for changes in divorce rate since 1971. Divorce has been an increasing trend due to numerous reasons such as changes in attitude, changes in law and changes in the economic position of women. In 1941, the grounds for divorce were widened meaning that ‘irretrievable breakdown’ was allowed as grounds for divorce. Irretrievable breakdown means that a marriage stopped working, but there is no blame on the people within the marriage; the marriage simply broke down and the people within that marriage were no longer happy with each other. This lead to an increase in divorce because previously couples who did not love each other had no specific grounds for divorce, such as adultery, and this is why the divorce rate doubled in 1972. In 1993, divorce rates were at the highest they had ever been, peaking at 180,000. This may have been down to high expectations of what marriage would be like, and these expectations not being met. Functionalists such as Fletcher believe that over the last few centuries, and idea of ‘romantic love’ has become dominant; when the love dies, people see no reason to stay together. The obsession for finding ‘the one’ can be pursued after divorce. Another reason for divorce rate increasing is that the stigma that used to be attached to it is disappearing. People used to view divorce as shameful, the church condemned it and would refuse to marry people who had been divorced. However, divorce us now seen as bad luck for those involved......

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Examine the Patterns and Reasons for Domestic Violence in Society

...A definition of domestic violence, according to the Women’s Aid Federation (2008) is 'physical, psychological, sexual or financial violence that takes place within an intimate or family type relationship and forms a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour. It may involve partners, ex-partners, household members or other relations’. A common view of domestic violence is that it is the behaviour of a few disturbed or ‘sick’ individuals, and that the causes are psychological rather than social. A startling pattern within domestic violence is that more often than not it is the woman who is abused. Kathryn Coleman (2007) found that women were more likely than men to have experienced 'intimate violence' across all four types of abuse - partner abuse, family abuse, sexual assault and stalking. Mirrlees-Black found that nearly one in four women have been assaulted by a partner at some time in her life, and one in eight repeatedly so. Whereas only one in seven men have been assaulted and one in twenty repeatedly so. This is confirmed by Russel and Rebecca Dobash (1979), where it was found that violent incidents could be set off by what a husband saw as a challenge to his authority. They also argue that marriage legitimates violence against women by conferring power and authority on husbands and dependency on wives. Official statistics on domestic violence are often an understatement of the true extent of the problem. Stephanie Yearnshire (1997) found that on......

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Examine the Patterns and Reasons for, Domestic Violence in Society

...Examine the patterns and reasons for, domestic violence in society. Domestic violence has different types of abuse that can occur. These are physical, sexual, psychological or financial. Domestic violence can take place in families, partners or ex partners. In society domestic violence is looked down upon and seen as a bad thing to do, but it still happens on a regular basis. Sociologists argue that domestic violence cannot only happens because some people are ‘sick individuals’ because it is much more than a few individuals. Statistics show that 1 in 6 of all violent crimes are domestic violence. Official statistics will never be one hundred percent accurate because most victims don’t report the crime. This is because they fear if they do it might get worse. If the victim reports the crime there is always a chance that the offender will found out which can make things worse. Some victims think that the problem cannot be solved by the police. As only warnings and being told to stay away is the only thing the police can do. Until the offender physically abuses the victim the police cannot do much. It is more likely for women to be the victim of domestic violence as men want to be the dominant one in the household. They want to have control and a sense on power. Leaving a relationship with domestic violence can be difficult for a woman. They might fear that their partner may go searching for them. If there is children involved they may not want to split up the family for......

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Examine the Patterns of, and Reasons for, Domestic Violence in Society

...Introduction Essay Question Examine the patterns of, and reasons for, domestic violence in society (24 marks) Domestic violence is the physical, psychological, sexual or financial violence that takes place within a relationship that creates a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour. In society, domestic violence is seen as wrong, yet it still happens. Some people believe that a minority of people behave in this manner because of psychological causes rather than social ones, however a number of sociologists have challenged this view. Domestic violence follows a social pattern and it is mainly violence by men towards women. Although this doesnât mean that it is only women that are the victims of domestic violence, men can also be equally affected by such behaviour. Middle Radical feminists see the findings of sociologists like Dobash and Dobash as clear evidence of our patriarchal society, they see that patriarchy has divided society and that men are the enemy. Radical feminists see that men oppress women and exploit them unfairly within society. They also link domestic violence to marriage and the conjugal roles of husband and wife, and that this unit is the main source of the oppression of women. Radical feminists see the domestic violence is inevitable as long as we live in a patriarchal society as it preserves the power that men hold over women. This is their explanation as to why institutions involving the police and courts are reluctant to deal with domestic......

Words: 377 - Pages: 2

Examine the Patterns of and Reasons for Domestic Violence in Society

...Domestic violence is defined as a pattern of abusive behaviour in any relationship that is used by one partner to gain or retain authority and control over another partner. Domestic violence can be physical, emotional, economic, psychological or sexual actions or threats of actions that impact another person. Domestic violence is commonly inflicted on women though men too suffer domestic violence. Most Sociologists would attribute domestic violence towards social causes rather than psychological. The police play a key part in dealing with domestic violence however, they’re frequently subjected to criticism due to the method used when countering to the issue. Several feel the police don't take domestic violence calls as serious because police involvement would be improper in which some may consider being a family issue. Nevertheless, others claim that since the police are vital members in society and are the initial point of communication when violence ensues, they should see it as urgency and reply in an appropriate way to instances of domestic violence. Official reports show that one in four women will experience domestic violence, and one in eight repeatedly experience the crime. Russell and Rebecca Dobash established these instances can be started by what the husband saw as a contest to their power such as a wife complaining at the husband for neglecting her. The Dobash’s feel that marriage justifies violence against women talk command and power on husbands and reliance...

Words: 1102 - Pages: 5

Examine the Reasons for Changes in the Divorce Rate Since 1969.

...It has been proven that divorce rates have increased rapidly in the least 50 years or so. This can be seen from the actual number of divorces each year and from the increase in the divorce rate. Firstly, one reason for changes in the divorce rate since 1969 is the change in how divorce is perceived by society. For example, 50 years ago divorce was considered to be shameful and dishonourable as it was considered good for society if couples got married and stayed together. However, since then, although divorce is still a personal misfortune, it is no longer seen as a disgrace. The reason for this change is the shift in social norms and values and also the reinforcements of new laws and changes to existing ones. The major change has been the introduction of the Divorce Reform Act in 1969. This particular law allowed the termination of marriage and made the whole process become a lot easier. It also targeted two main areas of the old law that were abolished: the irretrievable breakdown of marriage and the evidence of adultery, separation and poor behaviour having to be provided. Another reason for the change in divorce is the changing opinions of women in society. This is because during the 1950s, women were expected to get married soon after they left school and start a family. If they didn’t meet these expectations, they would have been considered to have failed within society. Sue Sharpe conducted a study in both the 1970s and the 1990s to find what teenage girls aspirations...

Words: 805 - Pages: 4

Examine the Reasons for the Changes of Divorce Rate Since 1969

...Examine the reasons for the changes of divorce rates since 1969 In 1969 the idea of an ‘irretrievable breakdown’ was introduces meaning that divorce could be given on these grounds and without having to find blame. In 1971 this idea became law meaning that couples could divorce on the ground of ‘irretrievable breakdown’. As there was no need to find blame it became to easier to become divorced meaning more people who wanted to divorce who wanted to divorce before the law came into action but didn’t due to the long hassling process, were now divorcing increasing the divorce rates. Also during the time of 1971 and 1975 two new laws came into play making women more equal in society. Both the equal pay act and the sex discrimination act gave women more freedom and independence. As a result of these two new laws, a very sharp increase was witnessed in women filing for divorce as they had greater independence and financial stability as they were working and thus earning their own money as well being able to get help from the welfare state. As divorce rates increased the stigma attached to divorce decreased. Pre 1969 to be divorced was seen to be shameful and it was frowned upon. But as society advanced so did the thoughts of people. But today’s society is very influenced by the media and the media like to portray the idea of a ‘prince charming’ and ‘romantic love’ which people live their live by. So when marriages do not live up to expectations and standards set by the......

Words: 389 - Pages: 2

Changing Family Patterns

...Changing family patterns Divorce * 1969/71 – divorce reform act – women had the right to divorce, this was because a lot of marriages were irretrievable, which led to breakdowns. * This caused a massive increase in the divorce rate, the divorce rate has continued to rise but we have recently seen a decline. Why – change in the law in 1971 * Secularisation – refers to the decline in the influence of religion. * The position of women – women are now financially independent, they have more career opportunities, and girls have a greater success in education. * People have a high expectation of marriage make couples less willing to tolerate an unhappy marriage ( romantic love – marriage should solely be about love) * Decline in the stigma ( negative attitudes towards divorce) Childbearing * Women are now having children later (careers ) * More women are remaining childless (pursing their career, and children are a burden) * 4 in 10 kids born outside of marriage. Why * Women now have greater career opportunities ( trying the break through the glass ceiling) * Children are an economic liability ( we live in a child centred society) * Men and women now have choice and are not being forced into a shotgun marriage due to unwanted children. This has been combated by contraception and abortion. * There is an increase in cohabitation ( an unmarried couple in a sexual relationship living together) ( this is known as the......

Words: 935 - Pages: 4

Examine the Reasons for Changing Patterns of Marriage and Divorce over the Last 50 Years or so

...secularisation. The changes resulting have affected marriage rates, which are decreasing, and more people are now marrying later in life and more than once. More people are choosing to cohabit, either before or instead of marrying, and this is becoming increasingly common in young couples. Divorce rates have also increased in the last 30 years, following changes in legislation and attitudes. As society’s view of a conventional family has changed over the last 30 years, the acceptable norms have widened. In the past, an unmarried woman would be looked down on, as it was expected that women would marry and invest their time in raising a family. If they didn’t, it could be presumed that could they couldn’t find a willing partner, or that there was something wrong with them. Although 95.1% of British women still marry before they are 49, it has become more acceptable to choose not to get married, and rather than being looked down on, single women are more likely to be viewed as strong, focussed, and independent. This means there is less pressure on couples to marry quickly, and so has also affected the rise in cohabitation. Society no longer views marriage as the only definition of a serious relationship, and this has given credibility to couples choosing to cohabit instead. 30 years ago, living together outside of marriage was rare, but cohabitation can now be seen as an acceptable alternative to marriage. This is partly because changing attitudes to sexual relationships mean......

Words: 1667 - Pages: 7

Changing Family Patterns

...interlinked reasons for changes in the patterns of marriage, cohabitation and divorce in the last 30 years. The number of marriages has declined as a result of most people are getting married later in life, although cohabitation has increased rapidly due to the changing social attitudes and the divorce rate has increased as changes in law made it easier to obtain. Since the 1970s, there has been a significant decline in marriage, from 480,000 marriages in 1972 to 306,000 in 2000. Women's expectation of marriage and life has increased since 1970s. Some sociologists argue that we place an increased value on romantic love, which had resulted in more marital breakdown. Young and Wilmot suggest that in the west we have a romanticised, unrealistic view of marriage and family life. Over the past 30 years, people have tended to marry later. Living together as a couple, partly accounts for this. Many couples see cohabitation as a prelude to marriage. Also, they are less likely to give up their careers and independence as now women are financial independent. When our marriage doesn't live up to our increased expectations we are more likely to give up on it in search of the perfect marriage. Functionalists such as Ronald Fletcher Talcott Parsons claim that people expect and demand more from marriage. They believe that higher divorce rate reflects a higher value placed on marriage. Feminists argues that it is women rather than men who are increasingly dissatisfied with marriage due to......

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Reasons for Divorce

...Examine the reasons for changes in divorce rate since 1969 (24 marks) The divorce rate in the uk has increased to 6 times the amount in 1969, studies prove that 40% of marriages end in divorce. 70% of these marriage petitions coming from women. There are various factors which contribute to the rapid increase in divorce rate, for example: FLETCHER, a functionalist, argue that this increase is due to the higher expectations of marriage which exist today, as marriage, in contrary to the past is not based on economic factors, therefore the purpose of marriage is purely love, therefore if the love dies and the marriage turns into an "empty shelll marriage" then there is no longer any use for it, which in turn leads of divorce and furthermore an increase in divorce rates. Feminisits on the oter hand would argue that the increase in divorce rates would be due to the changin position of women in society, for example the financial aspect, women have the oppurtunity to be in paid work, or recieve welfare state benefits, therefore meaning they don't have to rely economically on a marriage, and also they have the costs to cover divorce. This is also an explaination of the divorce pattern of 70% of petitions coming from women. Feminists would also state that the impact in feminist ideas have resulted in an increase in divorce, rates as it gives women more of a sense of economical independance, and also influences them to turn away from marriage, which is said by feminists to be a......

Words: 438 - Pages: 2

Changes in Pattern of Marriage and Cohabitation

...Examine the reasons for and patterns for changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation There have been many changes in the pattern of marriage and cohabitation. For example there are now fewer marriages taken place and remarriages now include divorcees rather than widows and widowers. Many people are also remarrying later in life. This essay will examine the reasons for these changes. Firstly, there are fewer stigmas attached to marriage. There is now less pressure to marry and people are free to choose the type of relationship they want. The widespread believe that the quality of the couple’s relationship is more important than the status of their marriage has greatly weakened the norm that everyone ought to get married. People are also less likely to get married in a church. Churches influence on society is decreasing because they hold strong views on matters such as having children outside marriage and cohabitating in which more and more people are disagreeing on. Churches are also less likely to marry divorcees, who make up the greatest proportion of people in society, which deters people from marry in church Changes to the position of women have also led to the changes in the patterns of marriage. Women now have higher status jobs and earn a lot more than they used to. There is a shift from the view that the women’s role is to care for the children and look after the home. This is because women are becoming more successful in education and are able to......

Words: 539 - Pages: 3