Energy Inc. Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By matisse50
Words 1528
Pages 7
Scenario 1
Energy Inc. has a present obligation (IAS 37-17) and probable liability (ASC 450-20-25-2) on December 31, 2011 as a result of a past event, the contamination of the land, because it is virtually certain that a draft law requiring cleaning up will be enacted. It is probable (more likely than not) that Energy Inc. will be required to transfer economic benefits in settlement which is an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits in settlement (IAS 37-23). The amount of the obligation or loss can also be estimated reliably since Energy Inc. has made similar payments for cleanup in other countries, which is the best estimate of the costs of the clean (IAS 37-36/ASC 450-20-25-2). As a result, according to IAS 37-14, Energy Inc. should recognize a provision in reporting to its U.K. parent under IFRSs and based on ASC 450-20-25-2, a provision needs to be recognized in reporting to its U.S.-based lender in accordance with U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2011. However, in the case that Energy Inc. cannot reasonably estimate the cost of the cleanup, a provision should not be recognized but disclosed provision in reporting to its U.K. parent under IFRSs and U.S.-based lender in accordance with U.S. GAAP (ASC 450-20-50-5).

Scenario 2
FuelSource Co. causes contamination and operates in Dirty Country where there is no environmental legislation. However, FuelSource Co. has a widely published environmental policy in which it undertakes to clean up all contamination that it causes and a record of honoring this published policy. Thus, it gives rise to a constructive obligation because the conduct of FuelSource Co. has created a valid expectation on the part of those affected by it that it will clean up contamination (IAS 37-17/ASC 450-20). It is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits to settle that obligation will occur (IAS 37-23).…...

Similar Documents

Apple Inc. Case Analysis

...Apple, Inc. SWOT Recommendation Outline Strengths * Market leader * Diversified products and markets * Superior revenue and margins * Ongoing innovative product design * Superior supply chain and manufacturing efficiencies * Product reliability * Highly effective advertising * Ongoing use of superior operating systems * Worldwide demand for the iPhone * Mac’s increasing domestic market share * Management is committed and confident * Allowing iTunes songs to be sold online without DRM | Weaknesses * The loss of Steve Job’s visionary spirit and superior leadership * Lack of compatibility options in its software * High R&D costs * iPhone’s late move to Verizon network * Safari’s conservative interface compared with Google Chrome’s * Apple does not have it’s own processors or memory, they rely on other companies for them * No plans to producte a netbook laptop | Opportunities * Expansion to a broader range of customers with lower cost product options. * Targeting of government and additional educational institutions. * Entry to new foreign markets. * Constant growth in the PC and smartphone segment. * Expansion into the gaming market * Growing market of energy efficient products * Production of Netbooks | Threats * Competitors with less expensive products * Competition in technology with other key players in the PC industry like HP, Dell, Acer * Competitors trying to recreate iTunes * Increasing popularity...

Words: 788 - Pages: 4

Energy Inc.

... Energy Inc. Date: February 15, 2013 Prepared by: Christiana Egwakhe Reviewed by: Professor Robert Elya ISSUE: Accounting for loss provisions under the different fact patterns. BRIEF BACKGROUND Energy Inc. (Energy), a Public Company, operates in the oil industry.  Energy’s operations sometimes result in soil contamination. Energy cleans up this contamination when required to do so under the laws of the particular country in which it operates. Energy Inc. has a widely published environmental policy in which it undertakes to clean up all contamination that it causes. Energy, Inc. has a record of honoring this published policy.  Energy is currently evaluating certain fact patterns to determine the appropriate accounting treatment required under U.S. GAAP. ISSUES 1. Is Energy required to record a loss provision for a legislation-required cleanup enactment, for old and new contamination, that takes effect soon after the year end, December 31, 2011? 2. Is Energy required to record a loss provision in a country in which it operates even though there is no environmental legislation in this country? 3. Is Energy required to record a loss provision to retrain a large proportion of its administrative and sales workforce in order to comply with changes in the income tax system brought about by the government? 4. Is Energy required to record a loss provision due to new legislation that requires the installment of smoke filters in its factories by June 30, 2012, thou no......

Words: 1289 - Pages: 6

Apple, Inc. Case Study

...APPLE INC. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS REPORT Apple, Inc. Financial Analysis Report Ricardo Figueroa DeVry University BUSN412 Case Study Instructor David Mozinski May 27, 2013 Case Study Report Outline and Grading Guide (150 points) COMPANY NAME/WEBSITE/INDUSTRY Apple, Inc., http://www.apple.com/about/, Electronic Equipment BACKGROUND/HISTORY The company began as “Apple Computer” by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. They were college dropouts. The company almost went bankrupt in 1996 even though they had a strong brand, rapid growth, and high profit late in the 1980s. Jobs then went to work and transformed “Apple Computers” into “Apple Inc.” with innovative and technologically sophisticated non-PC products in the 2000’s. By 2010, the company also viewed itself as a “mobile device company.” Apple became the fourth-largest PC vendor in the US market. Through multi-million dollar campaigns, such as successful “Think Different” ads and catch slogans, Apple promoted itself as a hip alternative to other computer brands. It also highlighted its computers as the world’s “greenest lineup of notebooks.” The goal of Apple is to differentiate its products amid intense competition in the personal computer and mobile device industry. SWOT ANALYSIS Strengths | 1. Pioneer of innovative and high-tech quality products like iPod, iPhone, iPad, and Mac 2. Globally recognized brand name 3. Large segment of loyal customers of “Apple culture” 4. Strong Research and......

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Talisman Energy Inc.: the Decision to Enter Iraq

...Talisman Energy Inc. is facing are the risks that they will face coming into Iraq, and dealing with the Kurdistan Regional Government. Talisman Energy Inc. will have to deal with KRG not knowing how they will act with the money that Talisman Energy Inc. will give them. Analysis The first thing that worries Talisman Energy Inc. is that they don’t know if KRG will use the money on economic development or to buy weapons. If KRG uses the money to build the economy then this will make Talisman Energy Inc. look like they helping a good cause which will help bring up the value of their stocks and make them grow. But if KRG uses the money for illegal purposes such as buy weapons. This news will make Talisman Energy Inc. look like if they support violence in the Middle East, which will bring uproar in the region. This will also make Talisman Energy Inc. look like they support Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction. If it actually came to pass that KRG was found actually spending money on weapons of mass destruction. Talisman Energy Inc. stocks would drop significantly and ruin the reputation of Talisman Energy Inc. Although Baghdad gave complete autonomy to KRG, they might still need to overrule these purchases of weapons. For other international NGO communities they will need to come in to stop KRG from continuing to purchase weapons and will ask KRG to safely destroy these weapons. This scandal would really damage the reputation of Talisman Energy Inc. Krg......

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Talisman Energy Inc

...Executive summary Talisman Energy Inc. is a company that has been through a lot in the past, due to their negative experience in Sudan. They were accused of aiding the Government of Sudan in the commission of human rights violations and indirectly providing funds to purchase weaponry, which eventually led to selling their Sudan asset. Now, they’re debating whether or not they should enter into the Kurdistan region of Iraq, potentially knowing that the same thing could happen. KRG is asking for $220 million in exchange for allowing Talisman to search for oil reserves. The main question here is; will the KRG use the money on economic development or on weapons in order to force their independence from Iraq? With the experience on the board of directors, proper due diligence, and constant re-evaluation of the situation, Talisman should find it easier in discovering potential risks in Iraq, hence being pro-active in finding and solving issues before they arise. With this said, I feel that Talisman should enter Iraq. Problem statement Talisman Energy Inc. has had problems in the past when entering into politically unstable markets. They are now faced with a dilemma on whether they should or shouldn’t enter into the oil-rich Kurdistan region of Iraq. If they do decide to enter into this market, can they do it without facing the same problems they faced when they entered into Sudan? Analysis Talisman Energy Inc. is a company that has gone through a lot of scrutiny and...

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Midland Energy Resources Case

...Question III: Should Midland use a single corporate hurdle rate for evaluating investment opportunities in all of its divisions? Why or why not? It depends on what kind of investment opportunity is proposed. If it is an investment that affects the company as a whole on the corporate level then they should use a corporate rate. If it is an investment that applies only to specific divisions then that division’s hurdle rate should be used. Using a corporate rate for division specific investments may incorrectly evaluate the riskiness of a particular investment. The rates should be calculated and used accordingly. The divisions of Midland Energy Resources, Inc. are a bit diverse and therefore any investment opportunities should be separately evaluated based on the division that will be affected. Question IV: Compute a separate cost of capital for the E&P and Marketing & Refining divisions. What causes them to differ from one another? Exploration & Production rE = rf + β(EMRP) rD = rf + E&P treasury spread rE = 4.98% + 1.15(5%) = 10.73% rD = 4.98% + 1.6% = 6.58% rE = 10.73% rD = 6.58% tax rate = 39% D/E = 39.8% D = 39.8 E = 100 V = D + E = 139.8 D/V = 39.8/139.8 = 0.2847 E/V = 100/139.8 = 0.7153 WACC = rD (D/V)(1-t) + rE (E/V) = .0658(.2847)(1-.39) + .1073(.7153) WACC = 0.08818, 8.818% Refining & Marketing rE = rf + β(EMRP) rD = rf + R&M treasury spread rE = 4.98% + 1.20(5%) = 10.98% rD = 4.98% + 1.80% = 6.78% rE = 10...

Words: 328 - Pages: 2

Case Analysis Midland Energy

...Cost of Capital Estimate for Midland Energy Resources, Inc. In the first section of my report, I list out the main models and methods applied to estimate the cost of capital for Midland’s three divisions, general assumptions made and the corresponding justifications. In the second section, Calculations, I not only compute the cost of capital based on the general assumptions previously made, but also discuss specifics of each division and the additional adjustments or assumptions made to justify my estimates. SECTION 1: Main models and methods applied and corresponding assumptions 1. Constant Debt-ratio Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC): WACC=rdDV1-t+reEV Assumptions: * WACC: as constant debt ratio is the underlying assumption to derive the WACC model, constant debt ratio should be reasonably assumed to be applied by Midland and its three divisions. According to the case, Midland optimizes its debt levels by regularly reevaluations against its energy price and stock price level and each division has its own target debt ratio. Although the actual capital structure sometimes deviates from the target due to factors such as market value of specific collaterals, it is safe to assume that the debt ratio averages out at the target ratio in the long run, given that the target ratios are not adjusted frequently. Therefore, the debt ratio can be viewed as a constant and thus WACC is applicable. * Capital structure: as assumed above, target debt ratio is employed......

Words: 1573 - Pages: 7

Midland Energy Case Analysis

...Midland Energy Resource Case Analysis 1. Describe Midland, its capital planning model and Janet Mortensen's role in the case. Midland Energy Resource, Inc. has three major divisions: Exploration & Production (E&P), Refining and Market (R&M), and Petrochemicals. E&P division provides the most profit for Midland. R&M is the largest division in Midland by revenue. Petrochemicals is the smallest division in Midland. Midland’s financial strategy in 2007 consisted of four principals: funding significant overseas growth, investing in value-creating projects, optimizing corporate capital structure, and repurchasing undervalue shares. Janet Mortensen, senior analyst reporting to CFO, takes role of estimating Midland’s cost of capital for various analyses, both corporate and division level, throughout the company. Her main method is using Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) formula to evaluate required Cost of Capital estimate. 2. Briefly explain the meaning of the following concepts: cost of capital, WACC, and CAPM. Cost of Capital: the minimum acceptable rate of return for new investments in the corporation. The opportunity cost of investing. WACC: Weighted Average Cost of Capital, a calculation of company’s cost of capital, which is seemed as composite cost of debt and equity. Every category of capital in WACC is proportionally weighted. CAPM: Capital Asset Pricing Model, a theory representing the financial market behavior. Used to estimate...

Words: 933 - Pages: 4

Husky Energy Inc.

...Husky Energy Inc. is an integrated energy company with its headquarters located in Calgary, Alberta. It is a publicly traded company operating mainly in North America and Asia-Pacific, consisting of businesses in upstream and downstream segments (“Husky Energy Inc.”, 2014). Husky Energy Inc. was founded in 1938 by Glenn E. Nielson in Cody, Wyoming, USA. Originally named Husky Refining Company, it operated as a small family-owned business selling road asphalt and bunker railway fuel to railways and farmers (“Husky Energy Inc.”, 2014). In the early years, two refineries were built in Cody and Riverton, Wyoming. After the Second World War, the company moved to Alberta, Canada to meet the market demand in asphalt and heavy oil. During the 1960s, Husky’s business boomed after the asphaltic crude project, the ‘Lloydminster Project’, was introduced because the Canadian government issued a strategy on displacing imported crude oil (“Husky Energy Inc.”, 2014). Nowadays, Husky Energy Inc. has its foundation in Western Canada with a large amount of natural gas and oil assets, production of heavy oil, and the company is also seeking new oil and gas resources around this area. With the success in Western Canada, the company operates in the rest of the world and is greatly profitable in Asia-Pacific (China and Indonesia), the Atlantic region, and the oil sands (“Husky Energy Inc.”, 2014). In the year of 2012, the company has achieved net earnings of $2.0 billion with annual production at......

Words: 1662 - Pages: 7

Energy Beverages Case Study

...MARKETING PROBLEM: Energy Beverages Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. Note by authors For analyzing of this case and solving this Marketing Problem, we used steps of Decision Making Process for a Marketing Problem known as „DECIDE“. In other words, we covered the case through following sections: 1. Defining the problem 2. Enumerating the decision factors 3. Considering relevant information 4. Identifying the best alternative 5. Developing a plan for implementing the chosen alternative 6. Evaluating the decision and the decision process 1. Defining the problem Andrew Barker, Marketing Executive of Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. only major nonalcoholic beverage company in USA launched Accelerade RTD brand. Launching such a product is not only creating a new brand, it is entering new segment of market, going from CSD (carbonated soft drinks) and producing ready to drink tea to new segment, segment of Functional Beverages. The market segment of Energy Beverages (Functional Beverages) is field of huge battle field of many competitors, and idea to enter it is under question mark. There are few questions to answer in order to solve this Marketing Problem: a) Shall Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. launch a new brand? b) If answer on question „a“ is yes, answer on the following questions: a. What should be the target market? b. How should brand be positioned? c. What kind of Marketing Channel should be used? d. What......

Words: 1349 - Pages: 6

Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages

...Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages Texas A&M Corpus Christi Marketing Management MKTG-5320 Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages Introduction Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. decided in September of 2007 to explore the profitability of expanding into the energy beverage market. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is a major competitor in the flavored carbonated soft drink (CSD) market, and also has a strong presence in the non-CSD market. The energy beverage market had an estimated $6.2 billion in retail dollar sales in 2006. The market grew at an average annual rate of 42.5 percent between 2001 and 2006, however, market industry experts estimated an average annual growth rate of 10.5 percent between 2007 and 2011. This slowing of growth was due to a number of factors: market maturity, an increase in price and packaging competition, and new entrants to the market in hybrid energy drinks, ready to drink energy teas, and energy colas. Analysis Strengths The strengths of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. include: * A network of bottling and distribution throughout the United State, Canada, and Mexico * Stable cash flows * Substantial portfolio of diverse and well known CSD and non-CSD brands with a position as the number one CSD company in the United State. * Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. believes is holds a competitive advantage with its integrated business model * Strong customer relationships Opportunities ...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Natonia Energy Case Study

...NATONIA ENERGY – Case Study Individual Review Assignment Date due 17th June 2016 COB (close of business) ~ 3500 words This document presents a description of the company NATEPCO, a full description will follow below. NATEPCO is a subsidiary of NATONIA ENERGY HOLDINGS in the imaginary country Natonia. You hold the position of CIO of NATEPCO and you have been tasked to prepare an IT strategic plan for the Managing Director of NATEPCO. Use thereto the following questions to cover all relevant aspects: Part 1 a) Sketch the Business Model for NATEPCO using the approach of Osterwalder. Make a short description (3-4 lines) for each of the 9 boxes and indicate (where possible) what kind of IT systems are being used in each. b) Derive the business maxims for NATEPCO (maxims are explained in attached article). c) Derive IT maxims relating to these business maxims (do not purely map 1-1). Part 2 a) Identify what is wrong / lacking with operational and organizational governance in NATEPCO. Where does NATEPCO stand on the issue of LIKE and AS a business (see attached article). b) Identify areas of improvement for NATEPCO’S IT organisation in the area of organization, e.g. Committees, Processes, Roles & Responsibilities, Rules and Budget authority. c) Develop an IT Balanced Score Card for operational performance management of NATEPCO d) Sketch a (high level) outline for a IT Balanced Scorecard for NATONIA ENERGY HOLDINGS. Part 3 a) Suggest new IT technology relevant......

Words: 3053 - Pages: 13

Abc Inc. Study Case

...Hiring Process Case Study for ABC, Inc. Comm. 215 January 23, 2012 Hiring Process Case Study for ABC, Inc. INTRODUCTION This case study will identify and recommend solutions to a faulty process. The information provided brings to light the lack of employee experience and time management, resulting in a failure to accomplish the necessary tasks to fulfill the hiring process in a timely fashion. Because of Mr. Robins’ inexperience and poor time management, several other problems arose that needed to be handled immediately. BACKGROUND Carl Robins, a new recruiter for ABC, Inc. hired 15 new trainees in early April to work for Operations Supervisor Monica Carrolls. Mr. Robins could not accomplish the necessary procedures for the new hires to begin work, including drug screenings, completing applications, providing materials and scheduling a facility in which to hold the new hires’ training. Monica Carrolls did contact Mr. Robins May 15 in regard to his responsibility in the hiring process, without verifying if he fully understood his duties, Mr. Robins did not give any indication he was having trouble completing the tasks either. Mr. Robins failed to have a current orientation manual on hand himself and previous employees had failed to keep a current master copy. KEY PROBLEMS Mr. Robins needs to address several problems to resolve the issue in order to meet his goal of having the new hires working by July. The key problems needed to be overcome before......

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

Midland Energy Resources, Inc.: Cost of Capital

...4129 JUNE 19, 2009 TIMOTHY A. LUEHRMAN JOEL L. HEILPRIN Midland Energy Resources, Inc.: Cost of Capital In late January 2007, Janet Mortensen, senior vice president of project finance for Midland Energy Resources, was preparing her annual cost of capital estimates for Midland and each of its three divisions. Midland was a global energy company with operations in oil and gas exploration and production (E&P), refining and marketing (R&M), and petrochemicals. On a consolidated basis, the firm had 2006 operating revenue and operating income of $248.5 billion and $42.2 billion, respectively. Estimates of the cost of capital were used in many analyses within Midland, including asset appraisals for both capital budgeting and financial accounting, performance assessments, M&A proposals, and stock repurchase decisions. Some of these analyses were performed at the division or business unit level, while others were executed at the corporate level. Midland’s corporate treasury staff had begun preparing annual cost of capital estimates for the corporation and each division in the early 1980s. The estimates produced by treasury were often criticized, and Midland’s division presidents and controllers sometimes challenged specific assumptions and inputs. In 2002, Mortensen, then a senior analyst reporting to the CFO, was asked to estimate Midland’s cost of capital in connection with a large proposed share repurchase. Six months later she was asked to calculate corporate and......

Words: 4074 - Pages: 17

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. Energy Beverages

...line of reasoning and applications rather than listing of what is already found in the book or slides. Question 1: Do you think this company is following the differentiation or cost leadership strategy? Why? Which growth strategy (market development, product development, diversification and market penetration) did they follow to improve their product portfolio sales? Reviewing Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. case and assessing the situation to dr. Michael Porter generic strategies of achieving and maintaining competitive advantage, we may see that the company mostly was following the differentiation strategy as it is offering differentiated products from its competitors in many terms including the packing and pricing [pic] As for part two ,and regarding the Ansoff's  product/market Expansion Grid [pic] Some may be puzzled and think that the company was applying a Diversification strategy as it was introducing new branded product(Venom ) into a new beverage market to the company (Energy beverage market), but that's flawed as the company did not leave its current product lines(beverages) to new products , it merely introduced a new beverage ( so it's on the same course) to a new segment in the beverage market (the same general market) the truth is that the company was just implementing a product development strategy as it's offering a new product to an existing market but merely aiming for a new segment in......

Words: 1783 - Pages: 8