Deterrence Theory

In: Social Issues

Submitted By jfondren
Words 1892
Pages 8
James Fondren
12/1/14
Criminology
Dr. McGovern
Deterrence Theory The deterrence theory has been a long study theory since 17th century, starting with Thomas Hobbes and then in more depth by Cesare Beccaria in 1764 when he published Dei Delitti e delle Pene (On Crimes and Punishments).Deterrence theory has continue to be study in more and more depth over the years by sociologist and criminologist and more recently the study of deterrence of specific crimes and using imprisonment times to deter crimes as well. The deterrence theory main idea is that punishment for crimes can be used as a threat to deter people from offending. There’s two parts of the deterrence theory, specific and general deterrence. Specific deterrence is focused fully on the individual; it instils fear in the specific individual being punished. This type of deterrence refrain the individual from future violation of the law. General deterrence is the Criminal Justice system making examples of specific criminals. The criminal isn’t the main focus but the criminal act and its punishment is received in a public view in order to deter other individuals from deviance in future. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher, best known for his work on political philosophy. Hobbes published Leviathan in 1651, which is the foundation of later Western political philosophy. In Leviathan, Hobbes describes men as neither good nor bad, he assumed that men are creatures of their own desire who want certain things and who fight when their desires are in conflict. Hobbes views that people generally pursue their self-interests, such as material gain, family and individual safety, and social reputation and these people will make foes without caring if they harm other in the process. Cause these people are so determined to accomplish their self-interests, the results is often conflict and opposition without a…...

Similar Documents

Delinquency Deterrence Responce

...will commit crimes because they think or know they can get away with it. According to the Choice Theory, the threat of punishment does not deter juvenile delinquency. “Choice Theory holds that youths will engage in delinquent and criminal behavior after weighing the consequences and benefits of their actions; delinquent behavior is a rational choice made by a motivated offender who perceives that the chances of gain outweigh any possible punishment or loss. Some experts believe that delinquent acts will not be committed if teenagers are punished severely. Crime prevention strategies include general deterrence, specific deterrence, and situational crime prevention. General deterrence is crime control policies that depend on the fear of the criminal penalties such as long prison sentences for violent crimes; this strategy is to convince teenagers that the pain of the punishment outweighs the benefits of the criminal act. Specific deterrence is the strategy that if convicted offenders are sent to jail or prison, the punishment is severe enough to deter them from committing another crime once released. Situational crime prevention sis the strategy that relies on reducing the opportunity to commit criminal acts by making them more difficult to perform, reducing their reward, and increasing their risks. Specific deterrence coincides with the general deterrence method. Specific deterrence focuses on the use of harsh punishments, such as extremely long incarceration terms in......

Words: 360 - Pages: 2

General Deterrence

...Running head: General Deterrence and Crime Prevention Is General Deterrence Likely to Reduce Crime? Diane Fric Student Number: 996148039 Sociology 211 University of Toronto Mississauga February 2, 2012 The prevention of crime has become a main concern within societies throughout the world today. An understanding of the term “general deterrence” is important in understanding this paper. General deterrence can be defined as “the belief that people, in general, can be prevented from engaging in crime by punishing specific individuals and make examples of them” (Keel, 2005). General deterrence was first introduced in the 1970’s by a criminologist named Cesare Beccaria (Deuschmann 2007). Beccaria thought that the legal system should focus more on preventing crime from occurring rather than punishment. Many societies continue to use general deterrence when trying to prevent crime. The oldest and most frequently used crime prevention is deterrence through imprisonment. Societies believe that tougher and harsher sentences are the best and only responses to crime. According to criminologists, “people will engage in criminal and deviant activities if they do not fear apprehension and punishment” (Keel, 2005). In order for crime to be deterred, laws and enforcement are used to raise an individual’s awareness stating that criminal behaviour will result in punishment and attention (Keel, 2005). For general deterrence to be successful, factors other than fear of punishment...

Words: 1754 - Pages: 8

Deterrence

...Running Head: Deterrence 1 Deterrence Criminology Shawn Caulder Excelsior College Deterrence 2 Abstract: During the course of study in references for the topic of deterrence I have found a vast amount of information. Most are articles written by different intellectual scholars in the criminal justice field all weighing in on what they believe the theory of “Deterrence” is and how it relates to the ability to deflect and or inhibit crime during war time, peace time and stately situations. In particular I found one article to be an astounding work done by a man named Stephen Quackenbush with an article titled General Deterrence and International Conflict: Testing Perfect Deterrence Theory (2006). Although this article deals with deterrence theory of international conflict it still involves the basic roots of deterrence. I would like to show that through Mr. Quackenbush’s work one can come very close to a “Perfect Theory of Deterrence “ by simply following the logic of the article. Deterrence 3 When searching for the topic it was my goal to find the meaning of deterrence......

Words: 2023 - Pages: 9

Delinquent Deterrence

...Delinquent Deterrence When it comes down to deterring delinquency the saying “Bark is bigger than their bite.” I say this because in today’s society young people are not easily deterred from doing bad things by just the fear of punishment. That just makes them want to do it to see if they can get away with the crime. In the world of crimes and punishments’ the whole idea is that if one person gets punished for a crime that it should deter others from committing the crime. If this is the case then it is not working because we still have robbers, gangs, shootings, etc. Providing examples for each of these would be as follows. General Deterrence Our reading states that “The general deterrence concept holds that the choice to commit delinquent acts can be controlled by the threat of punishment” (2005 Wadsworth, pg. 53). A good example of this would be to have more police officers on a force so that way they are seen all over the place and with more police officers the young people might think they may get caught. Specific Deterrence Specific Deterrence, according to the concept “If young offenders are punished severely the experience will convince them not to repeat their illegal acts” (2005 Wadsworth pg. 56). They have programs for young offenders so I would have to say that would be a good example for specific deterrence is put the young......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Theories of Criminology

...Theories of criminology Prof. Dr. Ayman Elzeiny Introduction :- What is Theory? Definitions of the theory Vold, Bernard, and Snipes defined it as :- “an explanation … a sensible relating of some particular phenomenon to the whole field of knowledge” On other hand Bohm defined it as “makes statements about the relationship between two classes of phenomena” Williams and McShane defined it as “generalizations of a sort; explains how two or more events are related” . According to Shoemaker the theory is : “a systematic collection of concepts and statements purporting to explain behavior” . And according to Hoover the theory is “a set of related propositions that suggest why events occur”. We can define theory as "Statement of a relationship between two or more propositions and concepts . which explains and/or predicts some behavior ". Introduction to Theories of criminology : There are many "theories" of criminology suggested by many writers. It would not be practical to list them all. a few only that have received some support. The almost prominent schools of criminology Were : The Classical School, "which began about 1755 to 1764" after Beccaria (1738-94) published his famous Essay on Crimes and Punishments; Along with Beccaria, the thinkers of the Classical School were Rousseau, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Jeremy Bentham, William Blackstone, Samuel Romilly, and others. The Positive School, " which began after the publication of Lombroso's......

Words: 14451 - Pages: 58

Zero Tolerance and Focused Deterrence

...Module 5: Zero Tolerance And Focused Deterrence July 28, 2013 Module 5: Zero Tolerance and Focused Deterrence In today's society crime rates of violent and gun related crimes are rising around the world. Whether it is by drugs, gangs, or weapons it is huge factor in the crimes in the society today. The zero tolerance policy is set in place in many areas because the law enforcement is tired of the crimes that could have been prevented by following the law. No matter if the criminal is a first offender or not the policy will hold them accountable for their actions. America needs to have the zero tolerance policy in motion to help the crime rates decrease. There are too many people getting killed, on drugs, or any other crime that happens in the world today. The main goal is to reduce the crime in order to have a safer area to live in. Everyone has to work together to make it safer for everyone. However, there will be times when everyone can work together but crimes are still happening. In New York there are always crimes happening every day even though the New York Police Department try their best to keep crimes off the street. When Mayor Rudy Giuliani was the current mayor of New York, he always tried his best to get programs to reduce the crimes in the state. According to The New York Mayor’s office the reports from 1993 to 1997 the amount of felony complaints dropped by 44.3%, murders dropped 60.2 %, rapes in New York dropped 12.4%, robbery dropped 48.4%, and......

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Deterrence in Criminal Justice

...head: DETERRENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1 DETERRENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2 Deterrence in Criminal Justice The theory of deterrence says that punishment for a crime will dissuade people from committing crime. There are two types of deterrence : general deterrence and specific deterrence. General deterrence is defined by Siegel (2011) as “a crime control policy that depends on the fear of criminal penalties, convincing the potential law violator that the pains associated with crime outweigh it's benefits.” (p. 95). In other words, general deterrence uses the punishment of one person's crime to teach the rest of society that this is what will happen to you if you commit this crime or any crime like it. It is meant to scare others so that they will not commit crime. Siegel (2011) defines specific deterrence as “the view that criminal sanctions should be so powerful that offenders will never repeat their criminal acts.” (p. 99). This form of deterrence is geared at stopping the offender from re-offending by making their punishment as harsh and unpleasant as possible. Today in society, the main concern with the criminal justice system is deterrence. The question is, what types of deterrence do we currently use and do they work? In this paper, we will overlook a few forms of deterrence that are currently used in the American Criminal Justice System. The most frequently used form of deterrence is imprisonment. This is also the oldest form of deterrence. ......

Words: 1621 - Pages: 7

Individual Theories

...Individual Theories CJS/240 10/06/2014 Juvenile delinquency is one of the largest issues dealt with in our society today. The immediate assumption to this issue is that individuals lacking a good lifestyle and low social class are more likely to commit any type of crime. But then there are those individuals with the same life situation who are law-abiding citizen, and sometimes end up obtaining a college degree. There are also those individuals who come from an established household with good parenting and a proper upbringing who commit crimes. The question is why do some juveniles commit crime while others who are in the same situation do not? Many experts believe the answer to juvenile misbehavior is on the individual itself, and not the social or economic level. Considering this, there are two different major theories about juvenile crime. Psychodynamic theory places it emphasis on the notion that one of the main causes of juvenile delinquency is children’s abnormal personalities that were created and developed in earlier life. This psychodynamic approach states that traumatic experiences during early childhood can prevent the ego and superego from developing properly, therefore leaving the Id with greater power (Palmerin, n.d.). The Specific deterrence theory refers to the effect that punishing one wrongdoer has on preventing others from committing offenses in the future. To determine the effect one has to ask what most individuals will believe will happen......

Words: 854 - Pages: 4

Deterrence

...Does the “death penalty” Deter crime? Deterrence The death penalty or “Capital Punishment” as it most widely known has been around for century. It has been used in biblical days as punishment for just about any type of activity viewed as unlawful acts ranging from fornication, and adultery to religious beliefs and practices. Many people have different views about the death penalty. The debate concerning which type of punishment is better, weighs between the death penalty and life in prison. Many argues that the death penalty violates the eighth amendment which states we “cannot use “cruel and unusual punishment”, or we might be taking the life of an innocent; while others says justice, retribution and it helps to lowers ‘deter” the crime rate in society. Whichever way the argument sways, the battle still wages, “Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed”? Whenever someone commits a crime the law requires swift and just punishment for any unlawful deed offering closure and justice to the family of the victim. But how do we know which crime is worthy of the death penalty or life in prison? Do we even consider the issues surrounding these sentences before ordering them? There are many issues surrounding the death sentence. Some of the issues that arise are: the morality of the death penalty, the cost of the death penalty, vs. the cost of life in prison, and the deterrence of the death penalty. Many people will say that the death penalty deters crime. Their argument: other......

Words: 470 - Pages: 2

Delinquency Deterrence

...will commit crimes because they think or know they can get away with it. According to the Choice Theory, the threat of punishment does not deter juvenile delinquency. “Choice Theory holds that youths will engage in delinquent and criminal behavior after weighing the consequences and benefits of their actions; delinquent behavior is a rational choice made by a motivated offender who perceives that the chances of gain outweigh any possible punishment or loss. Some experts believe that delinquent acts will not be committed if teenagers are punished severely. Crime prevention strategies include general deterrence, specific deterrence, and situational crime prevention. General deterrence is crime control policies that depend on the fear of the criminal penalties such as long prison sentences for violent crimes; this strategy is to convince teenagers that the pain of the punishment outweighs the benefits of the criminal act. Specific deterrence is the strategy that if convicted offenders are sent to jail or prison, the punishment is severe enough to deter them from committing another crime once released. Situational crime prevention sis the strategy that relies on reducing the opportunity to commit criminal acts by making them more difficult to perform, reducing their reward, and increasing their risks. Specific deterrence coincides with the general deterrence method. Specific deterrence focuses on the use of harsh punishments, such as extremely long incarceration terms in......

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Individual Theories

...Individual Theories Anna Braaf-Dore CJS/240 May 22, 2016 Amy Griner Individual Theories Specific deterrence focuses on the individual in question. The aim of these punishments is to discourage the criminal from future criminal acts by instilling an understanding of the consequences. General or indirect deterrence focuses on general prevention of crime by making examples of specific deviants. The individual actor is not the focus of the attempt at behavioral change, but rather receives punishment in public view in order to deter other individuals from deviance in the future. Proponents argue that the death penalty is a "general deterrence" to the acts for which the death penalty may be imposed, e.g. first degree homicide. The belief is that if we live in a society where the publicity and common knowledge of the death penalty being the consequence of certain crimes then this will deter others from committing those crimes in the future. By definition, the death penalty cannot be a specific deference. This would require the criminal to be alive in order to be deferred from committing the act again in the future. If the death penalty is imposed, this is an impossibility; he's already dead. Situational Crime Prevention Situational Crime Prevention' (SCP) is the name given by criminologists to crime prevention strategies that are aimed at reducing the criminal opportunities which arise from the routines of everyday life. Such strategies......

Words: 1134 - Pages: 5

Which Is the Most Appropriate Justification for Punishment – Deterrence, Retribution, Rehabilitation or Incapacitation?

...Which is the most appropriate justification for punishment – deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation or incapacitation? Give reasons for your answer. In this essay the following methods of punishment; deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and incapacitation will be critically evaluated with example to reference, thus the most appropriate method in collaboration with the justice system for the UK can be selected. There has been much debate with regards to the meaning and purpose let alone the most efficient method of punishment for many years. For the purpose of this essay punishment can be defined as ‘social artefact’ Garland (1990). Punishment such as prison and ASBOs tell us a lot about society such as who has broken the law and who is legit and trustable, nevertheless dose this in reality justify why punishment exists and conducted in a social environment? As stated by Durkheim punishment has a diverse effect on each person certain people react in a positive manner and others in a negative. However he left us to question from all the different strategies at the core of punishment which one actually works in different places or at different times, do societies use different kinds of penal strategy? Why did punishment such as ducking stools and stocks go out of fashion? Why have so many industrial democracies given up on capital punishment? Why has imprisonment become such an important form of punishment” Hudson, J (2003). Capital punishment can be defined......

Words: 2282 - Pages: 10

Deterrence on Death Penalty

...Deterrence Believing that deterrence prevents murders and other types of crime is a debatable topic that has been going on with the passing of the Death Penalty law. Deterrence is defined as:"the inhibitions of criminal behavior by the fear especially of punishment. the maintenance of military power for the purpose of discouraging attack. The definition explains how deterrence is a way of the law trying to scare off people of committing crimes by saying they will be punished by death or something just as bad. Because of the possible eye for an eye many believe that having law passed will be enough for to be scared of committing crimes and committing any type of criminal act. Ernest Van den Haas, a professor at Fordham University who has studied deterrence closely, wrote; "Even though statistical demonstrations are not conclusive, and perhaps cannot be, capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts. Whatever people fear most is likely to deter most. Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence. Perhaps they will not be deterred. But they would certainly not be deterred......

Words: 547 - Pages: 3

Competing Theories

...Competing Theories of Corrections Ruth Cushman American Intercontinental University March 11, 2012 Competing Theories of Corrections Correctional theories are series of interrelated propositions or assertions that attempt to describe, explain, predict, and define criminal behavior. There are many different theories that have been created over the years to help explain the relationships between criminal behavior and punishment. The theories of corrections have no doubt changed and shifted over the years, the more people began to understand the rationale behind criminal behavior. Several centuries ago, criminal behavior was once thought to sin guided by the devil or evil spirits, and most often was punished by hanging, beheading, or burning the offender. Then, around the time of the American and French revolutions offenders began to be seen more as highly rational beings who intentionally chose their own courses of action (Schmalleger, 2012). Contemporary sentencing stems mainly from the Classical School theory. This theory stated that criminality, rather than being caused by evil or some higher beings, was actually the result of the bad choices people make of their own free will. The other competing theories of corrections besides the Classical School, prevalent in today’s prison system are retribution, deterrence, restorative justice, and rehabilitation. According to the Classical School theory, the punishment......

Words: 1428 - Pages: 6

Strategic Entry Deterrence and the Behavior of

...1.1 Strategic Entry Deterrence and the Behavior of Pharmaceutical Incumbents Prior to Patent Expiration† By Glenn Ellison and Sara Fisher Ellison* This paper develops a new approach to testing for strategic entry deterrence and applies it to the behavior of pharmaceutical incumbents before patent expiration. It examines a cross section of markets, determining whether behavior is nonmonotonic in market size. Under some conditions, investment levels will be monotone in market size if firms do not invest to deter entry. Strategic investments to deter entry, however, may result in nonmonotonic investment because they are unnecessary in small markets, and impossible in large ones. Consistent with an entry-deterrence motivation is the finding that incumbents in medium-sized markets advertise less prior to patent expiration. (JEL D92, G31, L11, L21, L65) T he insight that firms may make “strategic investments” to alter future competitive conditions is one of the most fundamental ideas in industrial organization. Jean Tirole’s (1988) chapter reviewing arguments about how excess capacity, capital structure, advertising, contractual practices, learning-by-doing, and other actions can be used to deter entry is easily the longest in the text.1 Strategic investment models are difficult to test directly, however, and the vast majority of this literature is theoretical. In this paper, we propose a new empirical approach for examining strategic entry deterrence. Our applied focus......

Words: 15200 - Pages: 61