Courtroom Participation Paper

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Sebastian
Words 1401
Pages 6
Courtroom Participation Paper

Courtroom Participation One of the core components to the criminal justice system is the judicial system. The judicial system consists of participants who have specialized roles that are associated with the courtroom. There are 10 basic roles that the participants play which include; judge, prosecutor, defense counsel, bailiff, court reporter, clerk of the court, witness, jury, defendant, and spectators. The judge has the ultimate authority in the courtroom, and is used to protect both the rights of the accused, and the best interest of the public. Courtroom participation is an important aspect, and is necessary in helping to secure the rights which are protected under the United States Constitution. The courtroom work group works together, and is guided by ethical considerations, and statuatory requirements that are bound by law (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011). There are professional, and nonprofessional participants that help to make sure that everyone is guarenteed a fair, and just trial. This paper discusses the important roles that each particpant plays in the judicial system. Each member of the courtroom has duties, and responsibilities that help in the procedures that are established in court proceedings. Courtroom Participants And Their Roles The courtroom arena is equipped with different players who make up the core of the court system each player posses a different skill set and plays important roles in the preceding process. The participants in the courtroom are the prosecutor, the defense attorney, the judges, the defendant, the jury, and the victim. Each of the participants is intertwine together to resolve the decision of right and wrong. The head of the chain of participants are the judges and their main focus is to resolve any issue when it comes…...

Similar Documents

Media and the Courtroom

...Despite the fact that it is good for people to be aware of what is going on around them, there has to be a line to how much media can interfere into life of others. The presence of media in the courtroom assures that people would be informed of how the legal system works besides of being an observer of a fair and unbiased trail. But their presence in the courtroom with cameras, tapes, and other especial equipments would cause more harm than benefit. Freedom of speech in addition to people’s interest in drama of the courtroom stimulates media’s curiosity in legal matters, and sometimes this curiosity will defy the privacy of others. Media’s influence on public and especially on jury repeatedly has caused the change of the verdict, an example of this influence is a case from Capital Defense Network; “Conviction for murders, armed robbery and attempted rape with a punishment of death was reversed and remanded for retrial because juror read news accounts detailing defendant's prior assault of a woman with a hammer. Defendant's prior was excluded from trial because prejudice was found to be greater than probity with respect to this conviction.” [People v. Holloway. 790 P.2d 1327 (Cal. 1990).] Another example from Capital Defense Network that indicate how media involvement in courtroom and trails can waste time and money of the taxpayers, and more significantly change the aspect of justice for an innocent or a guilty person is, “Remand required where jury deliberations......

Words: 2179 - Pages: 9

Courtroom Participation Paper

...Courtroom Participation CJA/224 November 3, 2010 Abstract Going through the criminal justice system could be a slow and painful process. To help expedite the process of the overwhelming number of cases that must pass through the system, an ensured relationship is formed in courtrooms between the main participants in the system (the judge, prosecutor, and defense lawyer). Other participants in the courtroom are the bailiff of the court, the clerk of the court, and the court reporter and thier roles are important also Additional participants include the victim, defendant, witnesses, and (depending on the case) a jury. Courtroom Participation Paper The United States have what is known as an adversarial legal system of justice, which is legal cases are contests between two opposing sides fully and forcefully presenting evidence and legal arguments. Almost all civil cases and a majority of criminal cases are heard by a judge exclusive of a jury. The judge is obligated to provide free and unbiased judgment of the facts and how the law applies to those facts. In all criminal cases if the defendant is found guilty of a crime, he is then sentenced by the judge. Depending on the severity of the crime the judge may impose a term of imprisonment or he may order the defendant to pay a fine. If a defendant who is convicted of a crime and faces five years or more he has the right under due process to request a jury trial. A jury is a group of citizens, which......

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

Courtroom Roles

...Roles of a Courtroom There are many responsibilities when working in the government particularly when it is protecting the public’s safety and the sentencing of those who commit crimes. Matters such as adoption, divorce, juvenile matters, and custody are a few issues that must go through the court system. The individuals such as jurors, prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, victims, defendants, and judges all play an instrumental role during the court process. In addition to these key roles, the courtroom clerk and reporter are administrative roles that allow the court rooms daily operations to run smoothly and keep a record of the preceding. Understanding that it takes these roles to work as a team all playing their part to accomplish the objective. The judge is the main authority in a courtroom. They are appointed differently in federal and state courts. In a federal court the judge is appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and approval of the Senate. The federal judge serves a life term unless he or she is impeached, retires, or dies. The state judge can be appointed by the governor but usually are required to run for election and voted by the people. The judge’s main responsibility in a courtroom is to safeguard the rights of the accused and the interests of the public. They oversee trials and ensure both parties are representing their case under the law ("Role of the Judge and Other Courtroom Participants ", n.d.). The judge......

Words: 1108 - Pages: 5

Courtroom Participation

...Courtroom Participation The court systems in the United Stated seem to be a big soap opera; everyone is a character and has to play their roll. Everyone at one point in their lives has been cast in a position of either the defendant of the plaintiff. You make characters are the Judge, bailiff, the prosecutor, the attorney, the jurors, the court clerk, and transcriber. The judge is the one that everyone has to report to and he/she will be the one that determines the outcome of the case. When you address the judge you cannot call them by the first name or last name you must at times say “Your honor”. In many parts of the world they are sometimes called “My lord” or “My lady”. He/she is the one who presides over the proceedings of his/her court room. The judge sits on his bench and listens to the both sides of the parties, and the witnesses, the attorney opening and closing statements. If you need to give the judge anything then you would pass the papers to the bailiff who is the middle man between the judge and the attorneys, he always maintains order in the court room in case the judge can’t control his/her courtroom. The prosecutor is the one that presses charges against the defendant. They have to prepare the case and follow through with their finding so they will be able to convict or even have their case heard. The defendant is the one that being put on trial for their crimes and the defense attorney is the one that is fight for their freedom and rights to have a......

Words: 414 - Pages: 2

Courtroom

...corporation does not have any treasury stock. They retire their stock as soon as they repurchase it. 31. What is the par or stated value of each of your company’s stocks? Preferred stock, $0.01 par value Common stock, $0.01 par value Footnote Disclosures: 32. How many footnote disclosures does your company have? There are 18 footnote disclosure. 33. How many significant accounting policies are listed under its Summary of Significant Accounting Policies? There are 19 significant accounting policies listed under the summary of significant Accounting policies. 34. What does it include as Cash and Cash Equivalents? Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of deposits held at major banks, Tier-1 commercial paper and other securities with original maturities of 90 days or less. 35. What method does it use to value Inventory? The company uses the First In First Out Method. 36. What method(s) does it use to depreciate its assets? The company uses the straight line method based on the estimated useful life of the assets. 37. Does it have any leased assets? If yes, describe them. The company has leased certain facilities, furnitures, and equipements. 38. What policies does it have in regard to Foreign Currency Translations? According to the company’s rules, the functional currency of a foreign operation is the local country’s currency. Revenues and expenses of operations outside the United States are translated......

Words: 2308 - Pages: 10

Courtroom

...Courtroom Observation Case White v. Gibbs John Simpson Louisiana Tech Abstract This paper observes the court case of White v. Gibbs in which Debbie White is suing Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2014). Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendants. A summary judgment would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case (West Encyclopedia of American Law, 2008). The attorneys representing Mrs. White are Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The attorneys for the defendants are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter.   Courtroom Observation Case White v. Gibbs The lawsuit arose from an incident where Mrs. White and her husband Bruno were having dinner at O’Malley’s Tavern. On that night there was another patron at the bar, Edward Hard, who was also Mrs. White’s ex-fiancé. During the court case we find out that Mr. Hard had shown a lot of animosity toward the White’s due to Mr. Hard and Mrs. White’s previous relationship. There was also a former altercation between Mr. White and Mr. Hard, and even though this had been resolved, Mr. Hard still showed this animosity. On this night, Mr. Hard had a bill from O’Malley’s Tavern in which he was charged for purchasing 13 alcoholic drinks. According to......

Words: 1400 - Pages: 6

Media in the Courtroom

...Media in the Courtroom COM 150 February 27, 2011 Media in the Courtroom In this day and age the public looks for information though the media to inform them on what is happening in the world today, but with all the different ways that we have to receive information via the newspaper, or TV news, should we also allow cameras onto our courtrooms? There have been several debates on whether or not cameras should be permitted in the courtroom during court proceedings even though the media feels that they have the right to inform the public about how the justice system works, while some feels that it is more for entertainment, and others feel that it is just an invasion of privacy on the part of the victim and the witnesses. In my paper I will examine both sides of the argument and leave it up to you to make your own decision on whether or not cameras should be allowed into the courtroom. The media has been reporting trials for decades by the use of newspapers and or radio. But in 1935 television broadcasted one of the first trials which they called “The Trial of the Century”. The trial that I am speaking about is the Lindbergh baby trial, it was a highly publicized trial that may have started the debated on whether or not cameras should be allowed into the courtrooms. From the day the trial started hundreds of reporters would flack to the court house in the town of Flemington, New Jersey. The media had gotten so out of control that judge Trenchard had to ban the use of all......

Words: 1177 - Pages: 5

Courtroom Tv

... Courtroom TV paper Kimberly smith CJS/251 March 30,2015 Kenneth Bitting Introduction The Casey Anthony trial involves the death of her two year old daughter Caylee Anthony. Casey Anthony is accused of killing her daughter. Casey Anthony claims her two-year-old Caylee Anthony is missing On June 9, 2008 in Orange County, Florida. Anthony later tells police she dropped Caylee off at a babysitter's apartment. The name that Casey had given to the police officers was Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez. On June 16th 2008 was the last Caylee grandparents saw her alive. Casey didn’t give her parents any details about nothing. Later on in July of 2008 a post from the internet allowed Casey parent to locate the car which had been towed. There was a foul smell coming from the trunk of the car. 30 days after Caylee went missing or hadn’t been seen a missing person report was filed. Criminal process On July 16, 2008 Casey Anthony had been lying to the police investigators about Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez babysitting Caylee. Casey was arrested on suspicion of child neglect, filing false misleading statements and hindering a criminal investigation. The sheriff’s office then searched the car with a cadaver dog and the dog picked up the scent of human decomposition, Also they were satins in the trunk and hair. Casey was then was charged with child neglect. In August 21, 2008 she was released out on a 500,000 bail after being detained from about a month. Casey bond was revoked on charges of check...

Words: 978 - Pages: 4

Courtroom Observation

...BUSI 301 COURTROOM OBSERVATION PAPER Indiana Northern District Court Case Number 82a04-8876-cv285 Plaintiff: Deborah White Plaintiff representatives: Walsh Jackson and Amanda Babott Defendant: Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern Defendant Representatives: Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter Defendant Council Overview: Jordan Van Meter and Benjamin Walton are representing the defendant who is Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The representing defense suggests that the Court give a summary judgment to John Daniels who was the bartender at O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiff is seeking damages from the defendant, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s tavern stating that Mr. Gibbs had knowledge of Mr. Hard’s intoxication. The Indiana Law. Ind Code Ann 7.1-5-10-15.5 2006 does require that a defendant have actual knowledge in order to recover damages. Constructive knowledge does not satisfy the presumption, only subjective knowledge. Circumstantial evidences cannot support constructive knowledge, but only actual knowledge. According to the 7th circuit court of Indiana, visible acts of intoxication are subjective. The bartender himself only saw Mr. Hard sitting on a stool drinking whiskey which is not an uncommon occurrence in a bar. The case that was cited in the courtroom, the Ash Lock case (Ashlock v. Norris, 475 N.E.2d 1167, 1170 Ind. Ct. App. 1985) was not as severe as this case. This specific bartender at O’Malley’s Tavern did not have actual knowledge of...

Words: 1625 - Pages: 7

Media in the Courtroom

...Media In The Courtroom Media in the courtroom can profoundly change and alter the outcome of a trial by allowing society to form an opinion before justice prevails. How is that possible, from Judge Judy to the Supreme Court society wants to be involved by any means possible to give their opinion on how justice should prevail? The journalists and television companies sell this belief, they hide behind the first amendment rights to air and publish any information that in turn helps to sell their product. Society is blinded by the need to know mentality, they have not realized the end results may not end in their favor. The only time society sees an error in our system is when the error affects their lives. Reality T.V is a catalyst to this need to know mentality. Cameras, Television, Radio, Internet, and Journalists these are the instruments that set criminals free. Ladies and Gentlemen I intend to prove without a reason of doubt that media in the courtroom is detrimental to the process of a fair trial and a defendants right to due process. As John Q public should be aware the justice system is a process to keep society safe, if they interfere with that process how can they say lady justice prevailed. Let’s say they have a defendant who has been accused of killing 10 people he has signed a confession of guilt and of course has hired a lawyer. First he is arrested and informed of his rights. Next they go into the courtroom where a judge informs him of his rights and......

Words: 1170 - Pages: 5

Courtoom Participation

...Courtroom Participation Paper Keva Russell CJA/224 01/09/12 Mr. Mitchell In this paper, there will be discussion about the various courtroom participants and also discuss each role. There also will be a discussion of the duties and responsibilities of the major participants, how they are selected to become participants and their importance in the court proceedings. There are several different courtroom participants, such as, the judges, the law clerks (division clerks), prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, victims, defendants and bailiffs. There could possibly be additional courtroom participants, like, the media, the courtroom reporters, interpreters and speculators. The judge is a public officer who hears and decides cases in a court of law. The law clerks are the people who help with getting information for the judge, helping with entering verbiage into the system and looking up cases that have similar circumstances as the case that is presented. The prosecutor prosecutes the case. They are driven to put the alleged suspect, criminal or defendant behind bars or obtain a record from committing a crime. Whereas the defense attorneys help the defendants with their cases to get them from going to jail or doing the maximum time for the crime committed. Witnesses are the people that are called to court to describe a crime that they saw with their own eyes. Victims are the people that the crime was committed on. They also can testify against the......

Words: 840 - Pages: 4

Courtroom Participation Paper

...Courtroom Participation Paper The courtroom assemblage consists of numerous participants, the prosecutor, defense attorney, defendant, judge, bailiff, witnesses, and the jury. Each of these participants plays a significant part in the criminal justice system court process. Prosecutorial “The prosecutor is an administrator of justice, an advocate, and an officer of the court; the prosecutor must exercise sound discretion in the performance of his or her functions. The duty of the prosecutor is to seek justice, not merely to convict” according to American Bar Association. The prosecutor represents the government in court. The prosecutor is a key element in the justice process; the prosecutor’s role has evolved and become specialized and multifaceted as the law and legal system progresses. Their primary function is to prosecute offenders to the fullest extent of the law. To present the court with the focal points of indictment, present the evidence and argue the case. The United States Attorney General is the highest ranking law enforcement official in the U.S. and is appointed by the president. On the state level constituents vote for the attorney general. Every state is broken down into sections known as districts and each has a district attorney that heads their districts judicial system. Defense The defendant is the person accused in crime. A defense attorney can be privately hired by the defendant or if the defendant cannot afford one, one......

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Courtroom

...Courtroom Participation Lumengo McGhee -Houston CJA/224 November 24, 2010 Bruce Cartwright Sr. Courtroom Participation The defense attorney represents the defendant, the person accused of committing a crime or a wrongful act. Criminal defendants who are unable to come up with the money for to hire a lawyer are allowed to have the judge appoint them a lawyer who is then paid with public funds. The courtroom deputy or courtroom clerk administers the oaths to the witnesses, marks the exhibits, and generally helps keep the trial running efficiently. The courtroom deputy is employed by the clerk of the court. The clerk of the court is selected by all of the active judges on the court and works closely with the chief district judge, who is responsible for the court's overall administration in the courtroom, the parties may be present at the counsel tables with their attorneys. The accused in a criminal case has a constitutional right to be present. Parties in civil cases may be present if they wish, but are often absent. The plaintiff's attorney represents the person or company, or the government, which filed the complaint. In criminal cases, a United States attorney represents the administrative branch of the government. United States magistrate judges are court officers who support district judges in preparing cases for trial and administer some of the discovery process. They may also be in charge of over less serious criminal trials, and, when both......

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Courtroom Observation

...Activity Description: Courtroom Observation The case being presented today was State of New Jersey v. David Connor. This case is being presented in the Superior Courts of New Jersey at 50 West Market Street floor 10 Room 1004, Newark, NJ. The observation took place July 1, 2008 from 9AM until 3:30PM. The charges against the defendant David Connor are first-degree murder, second-degree aggravated assault, second-degree disturbing/moving human body, third degree unlawful possession of a weapon, and third degree possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose. David Connor has a co-defendant by the name of Tareek Gilliam. The judge presiding over the case is the Honorable Joseph Cassini. Romesh Sukhdeo is the assistant prosecutor from the Essex County Prosecutors Office and John McMahon is the public defender representing the defendant. Honorable Joseph Cassini began the morning addressing a motion to dismiss the indictment submitted by the public defender McMahon on the grounds that the prosecutor answered questions for the jury and the actions of the assistant prosecutor were inappropriate. The motion also stated that the assistant prosecutor became the witness. The judge also reviewed the proceedings that were mentioned in the motion to dismiss the indictment in which the prosecutor actually was answering questions the jury members had asked. Honorable Joseph Cassini sighted numerous cases including State v Bennett, A-2157-04T5 where the prosecutor......

Words: 3601 - Pages: 15

Individual Courtroom Participants

...Individual Courtroom Participation Individual Courtroom Participation The courts are filled with cases that depend on courtroom participation from key players to assure these cases will be prepared, presented, argued, ruled on and closed in the most effectively efficient way possible. The key players include the prosecutor who considers the charges, the defense lawyer who is selected to defend against these charges, a judge and jurors who are assigned to hear the case, victims and defendants who are having their sides of their story told for vindication or punishment. (Meyer, Grant 2003). A prosecuting attorney has the trusting responsibility of preparing and presenting cases on behalf of societies on federal and state levels. In these cases, society is the victim of the wrongdoing and the accusers are confronted by the governments ‘ministers of justice’ whose purpose is to ensure the guilty are punished for their crimes and the innocent are protected from unjustified prosecution. There are different types of prosecuting attorneys that are selected in a variety of ways. The U.S. Attorney General holds the highest ranking position of law enforcement in the country. Selected by the president of the United States, this position is confirmed by the senate. The Attorney General has no set term to serve and does so at the pleasure of the sitting president currently holding that office. Of the 94 federal judicial districts, an attorney general is appointed to each to...

Words: 1035 - Pages: 5