Case Study Kim V. Son

In: Business and Management

Submitted By JCExum987
Words 626
Pages 3
Case Study Kim V. Son
AC 502: Regulation
Kaplan University

March 31, 2015
In the case of Kim v. Son, Kim invested money into Stephen Son’s companies. I have to say there was not a valid consideration because in order for a consideration to be valid there are three rules that apply: 1) both individuals must receive something that is of value; 2) if a person promises to give something of significance or even value, then this would be a consideration; and 3) both individuals would have to have some kind of agreement as to what is being traded in the deal (Beatty, Samuelson, & Bredeson, 2013).
The UCC was created in 1952 in an effort to synchronize sales and other transactions in the United States. There are 9 articles of the UCC and they are: general provisions, leases, negotiable instrutments, bank deposits, fund transfers, letters of credit, bulk transfers, warehouse receipts and etc, investment securites, and lastly, secured transactions (US Legal, 2010-2014). Based on reviewing the 9 articles of the UCC, I feel that the Kim v Son case does not fall under the Uniform Commerical Code.
UCC is like a civil law which is based on a code of regulations. However, the reason the UCC was formed was because they were to establish a unity in the laws set up for the UCC. Since common law can vary based on states, it is good that the UCC has formed a code of regulations. I feel that based on the reading the Article 2 has the most significance because of the goods. Common law is basically used for all other services that do not fall under the Articles of the UCC.
According to (Beatty, Samuelson & Bredeson, 2013) the UCC oversees contracts for the sale of goods, while common law deals with the principles for contracts and the sale of services and everything else that is not is UCC related. I have to that in the case of Kim v. Son, there agreements only deals…...

Similar Documents

Case Study Alibaba Final V 1.1

...Case study Alibaba.com International Business Alibaba.com case study I. Case Background Alibaba.com is the flagship company of Alibaba Group, is the world’s largest online business-to-business trading platform for small-and-medium size businesses. Founded in 1999 by Jacky Ma in Hangzhou at eastern China, Alibaba.com has three major marketplaces. The company’s English language international marketplace Alibaba international (www.alibaba.com) serves to bring together importers and exporters from more than 240 countries and regions. The China marketplace Alibaba China (www.1688.com) is developed for domestic business-to-business trade in China. And Taobao (which means “digging treasure”) is China's most popular business-to-consumer and consumer-to-consumer trading site with more than 20 million registered users. In addition, Alibaba.com offers a transaction-based wholesale platform, AliExpress (www.aliexpress.com), which allows smaller buyers to buy small quantities of goods at wholesale prices. And Alibaba.com has achieved award after award in recognition of its achievement and impact on e-commerce, including “Best of the Web” by Forbes Magazine for seven consecutive years, the most popular B2B website by Far Eastern Economic Review, and other awards, including China Excellent Business Website and China Best Commerce Website. Alibaba.com is frequently quoted as one of the top five websites in the world along with Yahoo, Amazon, eBay and AOL, by domestic and......

Words: 2034 - Pages: 9

Case Study the Globalization of Ebay V 1.1

...eBay Inc. is an American multinational internet consumer-to-consumer corporation, headquartered in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1995, and became a notable success story of the dot-com bubble; it is now a multi-billion dollar business with operations localized in over thirty countries. The company manages eBay.com, an online auction and shopping website in which people and businesses buy and sell a broad variety of goods and services worldwide. Case: The Globalization of eBay International Business the Globalization of eBay Case study I. Case Background eBay Inc. is an American multinational internet consumer-to-consumer corporation, headquartered in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1995, and became a notable success story of the dot-com bubble; it is now a multi-billion dollar business with operations localized in over thirty countries. The company manages eBay.com, an online auction and shopping website in which people and businesses buy and sell a broad variety of goods and services worldwide. (Wikipedia) Operations eBay created an efficient distribution system that demanded virtually little supervision. Sellers paid eBay for the opportunity to design, set up, monitor, and supervise their particular auctions while buyers used eBay's software to search for products and place bids. After the auction clock ran out, the seller contacted the winning bidder to negotiate payment and shipping terms. For this matchmaking service, eBay charges......

Words: 2061 - Pages: 9

Case Study Decision: Consideration-You Be the Judge (Kim V. Son)

...Introduction The following case study provides an analysis of central idea of consideration and when the contract is enforceable because the agreement lacks consideration. In addition, discussion of multiple sources of law such as common law and the Uniform Commercial Code will summarize the difference between those sources and help to determine which one is applicable in the reviewed case study. Case Study As a recap of the facts, Jinsoo Kim invested about $170,000 into two companies part-owned and operated by Stephen Son who was not personally liable for the debts of the companies because of their corporate status. The companies eventually went out of business causing Kim to lose his investment. This fact made Son feel guilty who signed a contract in blood in Kim’s presence stating that all debts would be repaid back to Kim in exchange for Kim’s agreement not to sue Son for the money owed. At a later time, Son refused to pay Kim back and Kim sued Son to enforce the contract. The outcome of the lawsuit was that the contract was not endorsable because there had been no consideration (Beatty, Samuelson & Bredeson, 2008). To determine a presence of consideration, we need to remember that “contracts must be a two-way street” (Beatty, Samuelson & Bredeson, 2008, p. 163). Therefore, we need to review the following three rules of consideration: 1) Both parties must gain something valuable from the contract; 2) there should be a promise to give something valuable; 3) both......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Week 7 Case Study: Deal V. Spears

...Week 7 Case Study: Deal v. Spears HRMG 5700 December 8, 2013 Deal v. Spears Case Summary This case is about a woman named Sibbie Deal that was employed at the White Oaks Package Store that operates as a liquor store located near Camden, Arkansas and it is owned and operated by Newell and Juanita Spears. She began to work at this store on December 31, 1989. Around April 21, 1990 the store was broken into and about $16,000 was stolen. The Spears were under the suspicion that it was an inside job and based on Mrs. Deal testimony they suspected she was directly involved in the theft. Hoping that Mrs. Deal admitted her involvement on the situation the Spears thought about using a recording device to monitor the telephone calls. At the deposition according to Mr. Spears he asked Mr. Cope the Sheriff Department Investigator about starting to record the calls and he said he did not see anything wrong by doing that. Once the device was installed and the conversations were monitored when Mrs. Spears was listening to a tape she found out that Mrs. Deal sold a keg of beer to Calvin Lucas which at the time they were having an extramarital affair at a discounted price violating the store policy. After Mrs. Deal came to work and the Spears played the incriminating tape which consequently got her fired. Several weeks after the incident Mrs. Deal and Mr. Lucas filed an action causing the tapes and the recorder to be seized by a United States deputy......

Words: 830 - Pages: 4

Case Study: Weil V Theron

...Delilah Films, Inc., “seeking damages for alleged breaches of an endorsement contract and for fraud” (Weil v Theron, 2008).This paper will discuss how the contract between Raymond Weil and Charlize Theron was allegedly breached; the Defendants available defenses, and the remedies available to the Plaintiffs. Contract Denver and Delilah Film, DDF, is owned and operated by Theron. DDF is “both a film production company and a so-called ‘loanout’ corporation. A loan-out corporation enters into agreements whereby Theron renders services of various kinds to third-parties” (Weil v Theron, 2008). In May 2005, Raymond Weil made an agreement with DDF. Raymond Weil agreed to pay “DDF three million dollars in exchange for the use of Theron's image in a world-wide print media advertising campaign for Raymond Weil's ‘Shine’ watch collection” (Weil v Theron, 2008). The agreement contained a breach of contract clause, which stated, “no party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement or sue for breach of this Agreement until it gives written notice of the alleged breach to the other party and a period of five (5) business days” (Weil v Theron, 2008). Alleged Breach Raymond Weil sites a few instances where Theron breached the contract. The first incident happened in April 2006, when Montblanc “displayed a posted of Theron with the Montblanc necklace draped over her forearm” (Weil v Theron, 2008). Raymond Weil sent written notification to Theron and DDF stating the Montblac poster......

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5

Kim V Son

...Mr. W. Fireworks, Inc. v Ozuna 2009 Texas App Lexis 8237 Court of Appeals of Texas Fourth District San Antonio, 2009 Statement of Facts The parties involved entered into a contract. Mr. W leased a portion of land from Ozuna for the purpose of selling fireworks. Due to redistricting and city ordinances, the annexation of land the lease was cancelled. Two years later due to disannexation, the property was reconfigured and Ozuna reentered into a contract with another. Key terms to the contract were as follows: ** In the event the sale of fireworks on the aforementioned is and shall not become unlawful during this period in the lease and the term granted, this lease shall become void. ** Lessors agree not to sell or lease any part of said property including any adjoining, adjacent, contiguous property to any person(s) or corporation for the purpose of selling fireworks in competition to the Lessee during the term of the lease and for a period of ten years after lease is terminated. Mr. W sued for breach of contract, stating the 10 year clause. Statement of Issue Does Mr. W have the sole right to lease the property once the annexation occurred, then the disannexation of city limits. Also the fact that the sale of fireworks are illegal during some points during the contract are noteworthy but is it reason enough to void the contract wholly. Analysis Whether or not the fireworks are illegal is not the issue. Is the ten year non-compete clause binding? My......

Words: 309 - Pages: 2

Unit V Case Study

...McDonald’s Case Study V McDonald’s perceived product positioning maps in comparison to their corporate strategy do line up to what is expected. There are areas for improvement in relation to their direct competition in every town. In reference to EPS/EBIT, it is relevant to their strategy implementation. McDonald’s product positioning maps do line up with their corporate strategy. Their strategy or motto is “Plan to Win”. When I think of a fast food restaurant winning, I think of winning over the masses of customer traffic. They certainly do this well. What makes up this strategy is; continued growth in the US and abroad, being a sustainable company, new items, new designs of business models, and remaining very competitive (NMINM's University, "n.d."). There is nothing about being the best quality, friendliest customer service, healthiest option, or most comfortable atmosphere. In these categories, I feel that they want to just do better than they have in the past with continued improvements. When you take a look at these product positioning maps, they tend to fall on the lower ends and very conservative in many fields such as atmosphere, quality, healthy choices, and limited choices (NMINM's University, "n.d."). Areas they tend to do better than some of their competition is speed of service, taste, and price (NMINM's University, "n.d."). This is in line with sales. These are the categories that the masses of customers tend to pay more attention to. There are over 32,000......

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Case Study - Transamerica V. Lynes

...TransAmerica Oil Corporation v. Lynes, Inc & Baker International Corporation Case Brief Issue: This is a case of breach of an express warranty, subsequent decision, and appeal in the State of Kansas and the issue is whether or not breach of an express warranty warrants an award of damages under the Uniform Commercial Code. Facts: Harold Brown, TransAmerica's president, purchased 10 production injection packers typically used for temporary purposes, but advertised as a permanent solution. With most shipments, an invoice was included that contained language disclaiming express or implied warranties and limiting the purchaser's remedies. The statute of limitations pursuant to this case is four years. Under Kansas law, advertising may form a part of an express warranty. The written documents the defendants rely on were each titled "Sales and Service Invoice." The introductory sentence on the face of the invoice above the signature line for the purchaser's agent [**10]  begins, "I certify that the above materials or services have been received." That sentence also purports to require the person signing to declare that he or she is authorized to sign the memorandum as agent of the owner or contractor. These words indicate that the document is a delivery receipt and possibly a billing statement, but not a fully integrated contract. The sentence above the agent's signature line also declares that the "materials or services have been received on the terms and...

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Case Study: Delia V. E.M.A. Et Al

...Case Study: Delia v. E.M.A. et al Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx University of Maryland University College HCAD 650 Fall 2012 October 5, 2013 Case Study: Delia v. E.M.A. et al This paper reviews a case study of a medical malpractice suit that resulted in a claim against the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services for their practice of recovering settlements paid for medical expenses. Legal controversies with medical impact rarely reach the United States Supreme Court because such cases must go through several levels of hearings and appeals before even being considered by the Supreme Court. Medical issues must involve interpretation of the US Constitution or federal law, and at least four of the nine justices must agree to accept a case. The Supreme Court reviews only a small percentage of the several thousand cases submitted each year. Consequently, most medical controversies at law take place in state courts. Subject United States Supreme Court Case No. 12-98. Albert A. Delia, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. E.M.A., a Minor, By and Through Her Guardian ad Litem, Daniel H. Johnson, et al. Later the case was changed to: No. 12-98. Aldona Wos, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. E.M.A., a Minor, By and Through Her Guardian ad Litem, Daniel H. Johnson, et al. The purpose of the case was to resolve the conflict between the opinions of the 4th U. S. Court of Appeals in this case...

Words: 2010 - Pages: 9

Case Study: Keller V. Inland Metals

...Beyth-Shan Yodhhewawhe Unit 2: Case Study AC502: Regulation Case Study: Keller v. Inland Metals Kaplan University June 21, 2014 Case Study: Keller v. Inland Metals Express warranty can take numerous diverse procedures, whether verbal or written, and is chiefly an assurance that the merchandise will come across an assured side by side of value and dependability. If the merchandise flops in this esteem, the producer will repair or substitute the merchandise for no supplementary responsibility. Various such guarantees are written on a merchandise's packaging or completed obtainable as a choice. (Findlaw.com, 2014). In the case, of Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc. as to whether did Inland make an express warranty and did the company breach it, is that yes Inland Metals did make an express warranty and therefore breach the contract. This can be seen in the communication between the two parties, that shows Inland Metals assured Keller that their dehumidifier would work and even wrote them a follow-up letter telling Keller what the product was capable of doing. And after reviewing and reading the case, we can see that Keller was in need of dehumidifier because the indoor swimming pool in athletic club they owned was giving off a hot, humid and odor according to the customers. Therefore, the Keller’s went shopping for dehumidifiers. The Keller was not familiar with what size dehumidifier they needed for the job so they contacted two contractors and......

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Kim V Son

...In the case of Kim v. Son a contract has been agreed upon by the two individuals for Son to make his best efforts to repay the lost investment of Kim. However, this contract that the two men agreed upon is not enforceable due to lack of consideration for Son and the intoxicated state in which Son proposed the agreement. The consideration that must be evaluated is whether or not Kim’s agreement not to sue to recover his lost investment has value to Son. Under the agreement Kim stands to benefit essentially an undisclosed sum that is Son’s best effort to repay him. Kim argues that Son has received the benefit of not being sued which according to Beatty and Samuelson is valid, “Both parties must get something of measurable value from the contract. That thing can be… an agreement not to sue” (21013 p. 163). In this case there is no possibility of Kim wining a potential lawsuit attempting to recover his lost investment. As an investor Kim risked his capital purchasing equity in Son’s corporations, since they are corporations Son is not held liable for losses. I believe that because this really offers Son no value, while he could be sued it would be a frivolous lawsuit that he would not lose and would not create lasting negative impact for Son that he avoids by Kim agreeing not to sue. The lawsuit would create an inconvenience to Son but it provides him no value to not be wrongfully accused. Second the state at which this agreement has been made must be examined,......

Words: 655 - Pages: 3

Case Study

...11/10/2014 Kim v. Son Case Study Reading and learning about the Kim v. Son case was very interesting and brought up different contract principals to examine. In this study we see that Jinsoo Kim invested money into two corporations owned by Stephen Son. The two businesses ended up failing and all of Kim’s investment went down the drain. Down the road, after the downfall of the corporation, Kim and Son met to eat and drink where Son made an intoxicated promise with his own blood to repay Kim for his lost money (Beatty and Samuelson, 2008, p.164). At first glance of this case my thoughts went right to intoxication and how this contract could be voidable since Son was intoxicated when the agreement was made. However, further reading suggested that courts vary rarely allow a contract to be voidable purely because of intoxication. Some may be too intoxicated for certain things, but as long as they were aware of the contract being made, it would not be voidable (Beatty and Samuelson, 2008, p.164). Therefore, the argument that Son was in fact intoxicated would not hold up in a court of law. Looking more deeply into the case, I researched what the initial investment entailed. Kim invested money into the two companies; MJ. Inc. and Netouch International Inc. The investment money, as far as could be seen, was not given to directly benefit Son, but to benefit the companies. During the initial investment there was also never a promise to guarantee the loan or investment money (Kim......

Words: 661 - Pages: 3

Unit 4 Project: Baby Kim Case Study

...Unit 4 Project: Baby Kim Case Study Debra Anderson Kaplan University HN144-05: Human Behavior and the Environment Professor Beverly Adams November 8, 2010 The ethical standards that relate directly to the Baby Kim Case are the entire list statements, numbers one through nine. As a human service professional you will need to make it clear to your clients the purpose, goals, and natures of the relationship prior to starting services and negotiate with them an acceptable plan, as well as inform them of the limits of the relationship. As a human service professional you will respect the integrity and welfare of the client at all times. Each client is treated with respect, acceptance and dignity. Clients should be treated as you would want to be treated yourself in these circumstances. Clients are more open to accept help from someone they feel is not judging them or looking down on them. Human service professionals will protect the client's right to privacy and confidentiality except when such confidentiality would cause harm to the client or others, when agency guidelines state otherwise, or under other stated conditions. Human service professionals inform clients of the limits of confidentiality prior to the onset of the beginning of services. Confidentiality must be respected to ensure trust and to maintain the client’s rights, except when they are endangering others with their actions. If it is suspected that harm or danger will occur to others due to the......

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Case Study : People V Perkins

...Shawn Napolitano Term Paper Dennis Consumano People v Perkins On July 26th, 2010 , Perkins had been charged with six offenses. They were: Driving While Intoxicated, Driving While Ability Impaired, Resisting Arrest, Unlawful Fleeing a Police Officer in a Motor Vehicle in the Third Degree, Reckless Driving and Driving at an Excessive Speed. Over the next two years, Perkins appeared in New York Court 25 different times. Perkins had traveled from her home in North Carolina each time. The People had answered “not ready” on many occasions. This, of course, goes against one of the CPLs we covered; CPL 30.30, which deals with speedy trial time limitations, in particular section (1)(b) which states “(b) ninety days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein a defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three months and none of which is a felony” (Findlaw). March 22nd, 2012, four misdemeanor charges were dismissed on the grounds of CPL 30.30. The remaining two traffic infractions, however, were not dismissed. That is, until July 24th, 2012, when Perkins motioned to dismiss these remaining two charges. Citing, more specifically, CPL 30.20 which deals with speedy trials in general. Perkins claims that, this 90 day limitation is now two years, and her right to a speedy trial has been violated. Being that the delays were all caused by the People, at the expense of Perkins, who...

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Unit V Case Study

...Unit V Case Study BCJ-2001 March 29, 2016 Introduction The exclusionary rule applies to evidence which has been confiscated in infringement of the U.S. Constitution. There have been many alterations to the exclusionary rule and its applications throughout the years. The exclusionary rule, in addition to three court cases, which have had a direct impact on the rule, will be examined in this case study. The court cases are Weeks v. United States (1914), Rochin v. California (1952), and Mapp. Ohio (1961). The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and how it operates is accordance to the exclusionary rule, will also be studied. Additionally, this case study will examine logical searches and how they may have pertained to the three court cases. Exclusionary Rule The exclusionary rule is an interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by the Supreme Court, it is not part of the U.S. Constitution (Dempsey, 2013). When written, the Bill of Rights only applied to “agents of the federal government—not to those of local governments—the Court first applied the exclusionary rule only to federal courts and federal law enforcement officers.” (Dempsey, 2013, p.179) In court cases, the rule has progressed as an interpretation of the Fourth Amendment by the Supreme Court, which forbids any irrational search and seizure of a citizen. Illegally confiscated evidence cannot be utilized against a defendant in a court, as it violates the Fourth Amendment, thus, the evidence...

Words: 1934 - Pages: 8