Ba 370 Week 7 Case Analysis 7

In: Other Topics

Submitted By hwsoloutions
Words 325
Pages 2
BA 370 WEEK 7 CASE ANALYSIS 7

A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-7-case-analysis-7 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/
Product Description
BA 370 WEEK 7 CASE ANALYSIS 7,
Case Analyses 7
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC (Ch 15, p 510)
Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (Ch 15, p 528)
State Ex Re. Gross v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (Ch 15, p 533)
Senske v. Sybase, Inc. (Ch 16, p 554)
Cortez v. Walmart Stores (Ch 16, p 562)
Hoffman v. Caterpillar (Ch 16, p 571)
Hernandez v. Hillsides (Ch 17, p 591)
Stengart v. Loving Care Agency (Ch 17, p 602)
Dietz v. Finley Fine Jewelry (Ch 17, p 610)
Case Analyses 7
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format.
R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC (Ch 15, p 510)
Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (Ch 15, p 528)
State Ex Re. Gross v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (Ch 15, p 533)
Senske v. Sybase, Inc. (Ch 16, p 554)
Cortez v. Walmart Stores (Ch 16, p 562)
Hoffman v. Caterpillar (Ch 16, p 571)
Hernandez v. Hillsides (Ch 17, p 591)
Stengart v. Loving Care Agency (Ch 17, p 602)
Dietz v. Finley Fine Jewelry (Ch 17, p 610)…...

Similar Documents

Ba 260 Week 7 Consideration

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-260-week-7-consideration/ BA 260 WEEK 7 CONSIDERATION BA 260 WEEK 7 Consideration, The two key components that compose a legally binding contract are the agreement and consideration. The agreement involves a meeting of the minds where the parties to a contract agree upon the terms of the contract. For the contract to be valid, this agreement must include some form of consideration, meaning that the contracting parties must receive something of value from the contract such as money. In order to meet consideration's requirements, a contract must fulfill three elements. First, there must be a bargain regarding terms of an exchange. Second, there must be a mutual exchange. Third, the exchange must be something of value. In this situation, from first glance, all three elements are met therefore it The two key components that compose a legally binding contract are the agreement and consideration. The agreement involves a meeting of the minds where the parties to a contract agree upon the terms of the contract. For the contract to be valid, this agreement must include some form of consideration, meaning that the contracting parties must receive something of value from the contract such as money. In order to meet consideration's requirements, a contract must fulfill three elements. First, there must be a bargain regarding terms of an exchange. Second, there must be a mutual exchange. Third, the exchange must be something......

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Ba 350 Week 7 Assignment

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-350-week-7-assignment/ BA 350 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT BA350 Week 7 Questions 6-3 – Security A has an expected return of 7%, a standard deviation of returns of 35%, a correlation coefficient with the market of -0.3, and a beta coefficient of -1.5, Security B has an expected return of 12%, a standard deviation of returns of 10%, a correlation with the market of 0.7, and a beta coefficient of 1.0. Which security is riskier? Why? 7-2 – Two investors are evaluating General Electric’s stock for possible purchase. They agree on the expected value of D1 and also on the expected future dividend growth rate. Further, they agree on the risk of the stock. However, one investor normally holds stocks for 2 years and the other normally holds stocks for 10 years. On the basis of the type of analysis done in this chapter, they should both be willing to pay the same price for General Electric’s stock. True or false? Explain. Problems 6-2 – (Required rate of return) – Assume that the risk-free rate is 6% and that the expected return on the market is 13%. What is the required rate of return on a stock that has a beta of 0.7? 6-6 – (Required rare of return) – Suppose rRF = 5%, rM = 10%, and rA = 12%. Calculate Stock A’s beta. If Stock A’s beta were 2.0, then what would A’s new required rate of return? 7-1 – (DPS Calculation) – Thress Industries just paid a......

Words: 352 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 3 Case Analyses 3

...homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-370-week-3-case-analyses-3/ BA 370 WEEK 3 CASE ANALYSES 3 BA 370 WEEK 3 Case Analyses 3, Case Analyses 3 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Brownfield v. City of Yakima (Ch 6, p 176) EEOC v. Dial Corp. (Ch 6, p 185) Lanning v. SEPTA (Ch 6, p 191) Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Ch 7, p 204) Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America (Ch 7, p 213) Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Ch 7, p 220) Case Analyses 3 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Brownfield v. City of Yakima (Ch 6, p 176) EEOC v. Dial Corp. (Ch 6, p 185) Lanning v. SEPTA (Ch 6, p 191) Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Ch 7, p 204) Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America (Ch 7, p 213) Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Ch......

Words: 263 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 4 Case Analysis 4

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-370-week-4-case-analysis-4/ BA 370 WEEK 4 CASE ANALYSIS 4 BA 370 WEEK 4 Case Analysis 4, Case Analyses 4 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 242) Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 249) Dean v. City of Shreveport (Ch 8, p 251) EEOC v. Fairbrook Medical Clinic, P.A. (Ch 9, p 277) Hardage v. CBS (Ch 9, p 286) EEOC v. Xerxes Corp. (Ch 9, p 291) Case Analyses 4 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 242) Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 249) Dean v. City of Shreveport (Ch 8, p 251) EEOC v. Fairbrook Medical Clinic, P.A. (Ch 9, p 277) Hardage v. CBS (Ch 9, p 286) EEOC v.......

Words: 267 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 5 Case Analysis 5

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-370-week-5-case-analysis-5/ BA 370 WEEK 5 CASE ANALYSIS 5,Case Analyses 5 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Horgan v. Simmons (Ch 10, p 313) EEOC v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Ch 10, p 322) Cloutier v. Costco (Ch 10, p 335) Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas (Ch 11, p 357) Bachelder v. America West Airlines (Ch 11, p 361) Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County (Ch 11, p 369) Case Analyses 5 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Horgan v. Simmons (Ch 10, p 313) EEOC v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Ch 10, p 322) Cloutier v. Costco (Ch 10, p 335) Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas (Ch 11, p 357) Bachelder v. America West Airlines (Ch 11, p 361) Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of......

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 6 Case Analysis 6

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-370-week-6-case-analysis-6/ BA 370 WEEK 6 CASE ANALYSIS 6 BA 370 WEEK 6 CASE ANALYSIS 6, Case Analyses 6 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Chao v. Gotham Registry (Ch 12, p 395) Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 12, p 405) Vehar v. Cole National Group (Ch 12, p 415) Livick v. Gillette (Ch 13, p 430) Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension Plan (Ch 13, p 435) DiFelice v. U.S. Airways (Ch 13, p 443) MasTec Advanced Technologies (Ch 14, p 466) United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 204 v. NLRB (Ch 14, p 475) NLRB v. Whitesell Corp. (Ch 15, p 490) Case Analyses 6 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Chao v. Gotham Registry (Ch 12, p 395) Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 12...

Words: 329 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 7 Case Analysis 7

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-370-week-7-case-analysis-7/ BA 370 WEEK 7 CASE ANALYSIS 7 BA 370 WEEK 7 CASE ANALYSIS 7, Case Analyses 7 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC (Ch 15, p 510) Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (Ch 15, p 528) State Ex Re. Gross v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (Ch 15, p 533) Senske v. Sybase, Inc. (Ch 16, p 554) Cortez v. Walmart Stores (Ch 16, p 562) Hoffman v. Caterpillar (Ch 16, p 571) Hernandez v. Hillsides (Ch 17, p 591) Stengart v. Loving Care Agency (Ch 17, p 602) Dietz v. Finley Fine Jewelry (Ch 17, p 610) Case Analyses 7 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC (Ch 15, p 510) Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (Ch 15...

Words: 317 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 8 Case Analysis 8

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/ba-370-week-8-case-analysis-8/ BA 370 WEEK 8 CASE ANALYSIS 8 BA 370 WEEK 8 CASE ANALYSIS 8, Case Analyses 8 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 632) Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Ch 18, p 639) Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 18, p 647) Descotiis v. Whittemore (Ch 18, p 662) Collins v. Gee West Seattle LLC (Ch 19, p 686) Wittenburg v. American Express (Ch 19, p 692) Proudfoot Consulting v. Gordon (Ch 19, p 708) Case Analyses 8 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 632) Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Ch 18, p 639) Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 18, p 647) Descotiis v. Whittemore (Ch 18, p 662) Collins v. Gee......

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

Ba 260 Week 7 Consideration

...BA 260 WEEK 7 CONSIDERATION A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-7-consideration Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 260 WEEK 7 Consideration, The two key components that compose a legally binding contract are the agreement and consideration. The agreement involves a meeting of the minds where the parties to a contract agree upon the terms of the contract. For the contract to be valid, this agreement must include some form of consideration, meaning that the contracting parties must receive something of value from the contract such as money. In order to meet consideration’s requirements, a contract must fulfill three elements. First, there must be a bargain regarding terms of an exchange. Second, there must be a mutual exchange. Third, the exchange must be something of value. In this situation, from first glance, all three elements are met therefore it The two key components that compose a legally binding contract are the agreement and consideration. The agreement involves a meeting of the minds where the parties to a contract agree upon the terms of the contract. For the contract to be valid, this agreement must include some form of consideration, meaning that the contracting parties must receive something of value from the contract such as money. In order to meet consideration’s requirements, a contract must fulfill three elements. First, there must be a bargain regarding terms of an exchange.......

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Ba 350 Week 7 Assignment

...BA 350 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-7-assignment Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 350 Week 7 Assignment, 6-2 Required Rate of Return Assume that the risk-free rate is 6% and that the expected return on the market is13%. What is the required rate of return on a stock that has a beta of 0.7? ri = rRF + (Rm – rRF)bi Where: Bi = Beta rRF = risk-free rate rM = market risk premium ri = required rate of return ri = 6% + (13%-6%)0.7 ri = 6% + 4.9% ri = 10.9% 6-6 Required Rate of Return Suppose rRF = 5%, rM = 10%, and rA = 12%. a. Calculate Stock A’s beta. b. If Stock A’s beta were 2.0, then what would be A’s new required rate of return? a. rA = rRF + (rM – rRF)bA 12% = 5% + (10% – 5%)bA BA 350 Week 7 Assignment, 6-2 Required Rate of Return Assume that the risk-free rate is 6% and that the expected return on the market is13%. What is the required rate of return on a stock that has a beta of 0.7? ri = rRF + (Rm – rRF)bi Where: Bi = Beta rRF = risk-free rate rM = market risk premium ri = required rate of return ri = 6% + (13%-6%)0.7 ri = 6% + 4.9% ri = 10.9% 6-6 Required Rate of Return Suppose rRF = 5%, rM = 10%, and rA = 12%. a. Calculate Stock A’s beta. b. If Stock A’s beta were 2.0, then what would be A’s new required rate of return? a. rA = rRF + (rM – rRF)bA 12% = 5% + (10% – 5%)bA ,...

Words: 280 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 3 Case Analyses 3

...BA 370 WEEK 3 CASE ANALYSES 3 A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-3-case-analyses-3 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 370 WEEK 3 Case Analyses 3, Case Analyses 3 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Brownfield v. City of Yakima (Ch 6, p 176) EEOC v. Dial Corp. (Ch 6, p 185) Lanning v. SEPTA (Ch 6, p 191) Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Ch 7, p 204) Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America (Ch 7, p 213) Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Ch 7, p 220) Case Analyses 3 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Brownfield v. City of Yakima (Ch 6, p 176) EEOC v. Dial Corp. (Ch 6, p 185) Lanning v. SEPTA (Ch 6, p 191) Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Ch 7, p......

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 4 Case Analysis 4

...BA 370 WEEK 4 CASE ANALYSIS 4 A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-4-case-analysis-4 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 370 WEEK 4 Case Analysis 4, Case Analyses 4 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 242) Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 249) Dean v. City of Shreveport (Ch 8, p 251) EEOC v. Fairbrook Medical Clinic, P.A. (Ch 9, p 277) Hardage v. CBS (Ch 9, p 286) EEOC v. Xerxes Corp. (Ch 9, p 291) Case Analyses 4 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 242) Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 249) Dean v. City of Shreveport (Ch 8, p 251) EEOC v. Fairbrook......

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 5 Case Analysis 5

...BA 370 WEEK 5 CASE ANALYSIS 5 A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-5-case-analysis-5 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 370 WEEK 5 CASE ANALYSIS 5,Case Analyses 5 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Horgan v. Simmons (Ch 10, p 313) EEOC v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Ch 10, p 322) Cloutier v. Costco (Ch 10, p 335) Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas (Ch 11, p 357) Bachelder v. America West Airlines (Ch 11, p 361) Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County (Ch 11, p 369) Case Analyses 5 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Horgan v. Simmons (Ch 10, p 313) EEOC v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Ch 10, p 322) Cloutier v. Costco (Ch 10, p 335) Scobey v. Nucor......

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 6 Case Analysis 6

...BA 370 WEEK 6 CASE ANALYSIS 6 A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-6-case-analysis-6 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 370 WEEK 6 CASE ANALYSIS 6, Case Analyses 6 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Chao v. Gotham Registry (Ch 12, p 395) Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 12, p 405) Vehar v. Cole National Group (Ch 12, p 415) Livick v. Gillette (Ch 13, p 430) Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension Plan (Ch 13, p 435) DiFelice v. U.S. Airways (Ch 13, p 443) MasTec Advanced Technologies (Ch 14, p 466) United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 204 v. NLRB (Ch 14, p 475) NLRB v. Whitesell Corp. (Ch 15, p 490) Case Analyses 6 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA......

Words: 337 - Pages: 2

Ba 370 Week 8 Case Analysis 8

...BA 370 WEEK 8 CASE ANALYSIS 8 A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=week-8-case-analysis-8 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description BA 370 WEEK 8 CASE ANALYSIS 8, Case Analyses 8 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 632) Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Ch 18, p 639) Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 18, p 647) Descotiis v. Whittemore (Ch 18, p 662) Collins v. Gee West Seattle LLC (Ch 19, p 686) Wittenburg v. American Express (Ch 19, p 692) Proudfoot Consulting v. Gordon (Ch 19, p 708) Case Analyses 8 Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed guidelines for APA format. Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 632) Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Ch 18, p 639) Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch...

Words: 409 - Pages: 2