Actus Reus

In: Other Topics

Submitted By hnatkova
Words 3016
Pages 13
1. Actus reus is the Latin term used to describe a criminal act. Every crime must be considered in two parts-the physical act of the crime (actus reus) and the mental intent to do the crime (mens rea).
Преступление — это общественно опасное, противоправное, виновное деяние дееспособного лица, за которое предусмотрено уголовное наказание. Crime - is socially dangerous , illegal , guilty act capable person, which provides criminal penalties.
Crimes are defined by criminal law, which refers to a body of federal and state rules that prohibit behavior the government deems harmful to society. If one engages in such behavior, they may be guilty of a crime and prosecuted in criminal court.
In today’s society, criminal behavior and criminal trials are highly publicized in the media and commonly the storyline in hit television shows and movies. As a result, people may consider themselves well-informed on the different types of crimes. However, the law can be quite complicated.
There are many different types of crimes but, generally, crimes can be divided into four major categories,personal crimes, property crimes, inchoate crimes, and Statutory Crimes: * Personal Crimes – “Offenses against the Person”: These are crimes that result in physical or mental harm to another person. Personal crimes include: * Assault * Battery * False Imprisonment * Kidnapping * Homicide – crimes such as first and second degree, murder, and involuntary manslaughter, and vehicular homicide * Rape, statutory rape, sexual assault and other offenses of a sexual nature * Property Crimes – “Offenses against Property”: These are crimes that do not necessarily involve harm to another person. Instead, they involve an interference with another person’s right to use or enjoy their property. Property crimes include: * Larceny (theft)…...

Similar Documents

Breach of Duty That Caused the Damage in Negligence, or Whether It Was a ‘Novus Actus Interveniens

...The objective of this essay is to explore the three situations in which it can be difficult to determine whether it was the defendant’s breach of duty that caused the damage in negligence, or whether it was a ‘novus actus interveniens’. Primarily this essay will address the first situation which is called Natural or “instinctive” intervention. Secondly this essay will identify the second intervention which is called intervening act of a third party. Finally this essay the will explain the third intervention which is called act of the claimant. To understand the role of these three principles the assignment will look at the different cases and the different decisions that have been decided. The first section will describe the Natural (or “instinctive”) intervention and look into the cases that have used this principle. Natural intervention is one of the forms of novus actus interveniens and is used when an unforeseeable natural event has occurred. A natural event will break the chain of causation when it causes damage simply because breach of duty has placed the claimant or their property in a position where the damage can be caused. One case which this principle was used is Carslogie Steamship Co v Royal Norwegian Government. The House of Lords and they decided the defendants were only liable for such loss of profits suffered by the defendants’ wrongful act. They determined that the heavy weather was an unforeseeable natural event and that the damages that were caused to...

Words: 1596 - Pages: 7

Criminal Justice

...Unit 9 final project CJ 230-02 Criminal Law for Criminal Justice Prof. Sara Block July 15, 2013 First degree murder is a crime against a person. The actus rea is the “guilty act” of the murder, or killing itself. For first degree murder, you need to establish the mens rea, or “guilty mind”, which would be determine if the murder was premeditated or not. The mens rea, the act of a guilty mind. First degree murder is a premeditated crime. That init self is indicative of the mens rea of the perpetrator. The elements of mens rea are the act was done: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently. Elements of murder in Texas do not have to be pre-meditated to be first degree. You can be charged with murder 1. If you intentional or knowingly caused the death of someone it is first degree. 2. If you intended to cause serious bodily injury and commit an act that is dangerous to human life that causes death. 3. If you commit or attempt to commit a felony, and in......

Words: 1526 - Pages: 7

Supreme Court Case

...hand Cotton was found not criminal liability for the charges in criminal court but Tolan took his case to the Supreme Court. Cotton then was found responsible in civil court. Difference between the various elements of crime including actus reus, mens rea, and concurrence Mens rea, actus reus, and concurrence are all elements to a crime. These elements must be present to charge a person with a crime. The guilty mind is known as the mens rea being that a person has the intent to commit the crime with the mental capacity. The “actus reus” of an offense typically is described as including the conduct constituting the offense, as well as any required circumstances or results of the conduct (Robinson, 1999). Concurrence means that a person intent and conduct a crime that they committed. When you speak of the elements of a crime such as the mens rea, actus reus, and concurrence these elements were not a trio when Cotton shot Tolan. After understanding these elements I realized that a concurrence was not present, but however mens rea was present. He intends to shoot Tolan, and in Cotton sworn testimony he intent to shoot him because he thought that he had a weapon. However, actus rea was present. Cotton actually committed the crime so that is why actus rea was present. References Find Law. (2014). Retrieved from Robinson, P. (1999). Mens Rea. Men Rea. Retrieved from......

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Basic Elements of a Crime

...offenses that were intentionally performed. In this paper I will give a brief overview of criminal law, the distinction between mens rea and actus reus, the concurrence of mens rea and actus reus finishing with “The Simmons Criminal Matter” case file. Criminal Law Criminal law consists of prosecution by the federal or state government, through a prosecutor initiating a suit, upon an individual or individuals for a wrongful offense that was deemed as a crime and was intentionally performed. The individual or individuals charged with the commission of a crime may be incarcerated, fined or both. “A crime is a social wrong or social evil punishable under the law also known as a criminal statute.” (Hames and Ekern, 2010) Most crimes in the United States are established by local, state and federal governments. Crimes include common law, felonies which are more serious offenses and misdemeanors the less serious offenses. No offense can me deemed as a crime if it has not been previously established as such either by statute set in place by the government or common law. All statues defining criminal intent can be broken down into three basic elements: mens rea also known as guilty state of mind, actus reus also known as the physical act by the individual or individuals and concurrence which is the relationship between mens rea and actus reus. Mens Rea The mens rea “depicts the state of mind indicating culpability of criminal intent, which is required by statutes as an element of...

Words: 1015 - Pages: 5

Unit 1 Task 3

...crime are the actus reus and mens rea. The actus reus is a crime comprises an actus reus, or a criminal act or omission, and a mens rea, or a criminal intent. Actus reus generally involves three elements or components: first one is a voluntary act or failure to perform an act, second is who causes, and third one is a social harm condemned under a criminal statute. The conduct itself might be criminal. For example the conduct of lying under oath represents the actus reus of perjury. It does not matter that whether the lie is believed or if had any effect on the outcome of the case, the actus reus of the crime is complete upon the conduct. Examples of conduct crimes are things like Perjury, Theft, Making off without payment, rape and possession of drugs or a firearm. The actus reus may relate to the result of the act or omission of the defendant. The conduct itself may not be criminal, but the result of the conduct may be for example it is not a crime to throw a stone, but if it hits a person or smashes a window it could amount to a crime. Causation must be established in all result crimes. Examples of result crimes are things like Assault, Battery, ABH, Wounding and GBH, Murder & Manslaughter and Criminal damage. For state of affairs crimes the actus reus consists of 'being' rather than 'doing' for example 'being' drunk in charge of a vehicle (Duck v Peacock 1949) or 'being' an illegal alien (R v Larsonneur 1933). Occasionally an omission can amount to the actus reus of......

Words: 2256 - Pages: 10

Understanding Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and the Basic Elements of a Crime

...Name Kaplan University LS-100 Date Understanding Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and the basic elements of a crime The mental state, also called mens rea, refers to the guilty state of mind of the defendant. The thoughts and intentions of the defendant when the crime was committed effect the outcome of the case. The motive of the crime can determine if the prosecution seeks to try the defendant in criminal or civil court. Mens Rea has four states of mind: purposeful, knowing, reckless, and negligent. A purposeful act occurs when the defendant intends to commit a crime with an intended result. The defendant is fully aware of the possible outcome of his act and intends to achieve a specific result. For example: Jerry set fire to his ex-wife’s home with the intention of killing her. In his testimony to the police, Jerry admitted that he was completely aware of the result and acted with purpose. The state prosecuted Jerry in criminal court, where the judge convicted him of first-degree murder. A knowing act differs from a purposeful act in that the defendant intended to cause harm, knowing what the result would be, but did not act toward a specific individual. For example: Denise set off a bomb in a crowded, public place, without having a specific victim in mind. She knew the result of her crime could end with the death of at least one person, but she had no specific victim in mind when planting the bomb. A reckless act occurs when the defendant is......

Words: 749 - Pages: 3

Josh Cassidy

...Actus Reus The equation for Actus Reus is, Actus Reus, which is a guilty act and must be voluntary. Actus Reus is actually doing the acting, for example stabbing someone. The next part of the equation is plus Mens Rea, this means guilty mind, which means they had to of wanted to stab someone either by Intention, recklessness or malice aforethought. Strict liability can be here instead, this is where committing the offense alone is enough for you to be guilty, for example speeding, it doesn’t matter if you intended to you did it and that’s enough for you to be charged. Absence of defence is next and finally this all equals crime. Actus Reus + Mens Rea or Strict Liability + Absence of a defence = Crime There are four ways in which Actus Reus can be committed. The first is “Results crimes are those in which the actus Reus is defined in terms of prohibited consequences irrespective of how these are brought about.” This is where causation takes place and it is the actual consequences that are important where physical act links with consequences and results. The next for cases are example of causation. T R v Smith 1959, a fight broke out in a military barracks and a soldier was stabbed, on the way to the hospital he was dropped twice and the treatment at the hospital was inadequate, he later died, did he die because of the wound or the care he received. The stabbing was seen as the reason he died. R v Malcherek, a Defendant’s actions put him in the hospital and on life......

Words: 1392 - Pages: 6

Tma O4

...the actus reus (the guilty act prohibited by law) that needs to be satisfied before a person can be convicted of an offence. This essay will consider how factual and legal causation can be established in regards to acts and omissions before discussing the views of Brett and Waller concerning the fairness of legal causation in situations such as refusing medical treatment and careless driving. For a person to be convicted for an offence the prosecution will establish firstly whether the person has committed the actus reus, secondly, the persons state of mind at the time of offence such as intent or recklessness (mens rea) and lastly whether the defendant has a valid defence such as self defence. To establish the actus reus of an offence the courts will consider the guilty act, the circumstances at the time of the act and the consequences of that act. These are commonly defined within statute relating to the particular offence, for example, the actus reus of criminal damage is defined in s.1(1) of Criminal Damage Act 1971 as “a person who, without lawful excuse destroys or damages property belonging to another”. Criminal damage requires a consequence from an action making it a result crime; therefore the prosecution would have to show that the defendants conduct had caused a consequence that is prohibited by criminal law, this is known as causation. Causation consists of two elements, factual and legal causation, both of which need to be established before the actus reus......

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7

Btec Law

...Understanding the elements of a crime and the aims of sentencing Task 1:1: Actus reus In criminal law actus reus consists of all elements of crime aside from the defendants’ state of mind. Actus reus can consist of the following; Voluntary acts Because this is the physical action carried out by someone it is the most common type of actus reus e.g deliberately causing someone pain by hitting them. Because the criminal law is mainly affected with fault on the defendants part, it has to be an intentional (voluntary) act otherwise if the defendant has no control over his or her actions they have not correctly committed the actus reus. In Hill v Baxter [1958] the court gave examples of situations where a driver of a vehicle could not be said to be doing the act of driving voluntarily. These included a driver losing control of his vehicle by being stung by a swarm of bees, or of he was struck on the head by a stone or had a heart attack whilst driving. Involuntary Act Examples of involuntary acts include where the defendant hits another person because of a reflex action or a muscle spasm, another is where one person pushed a second person causing them to bump into a third person. In this situation the act of the second person who has been pushed is involuntary. Even though he has still hit the third person, he has not committed the Actus Reus for any assault offence. This applied in the case of Mitchell [1983] the defendant tried to push his way into a queue at the post......

Words: 5108 - Pages: 21

Crj 306 All Dqs and Assignments

...AND ASSIGNMENTS CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 1 Criminal Law Terminology CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 2 Jurisdiction and Searches CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 1 Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and Concurrence CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 2 Due Process CRJ 306 Week 2 Ethics in Criminal Procedure CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 1 Fifth Amendment CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 2 Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause CRJ 306 Week 3 Parties and Pretrial Procedures CRJ 306 ALL DQS AND ASSIGNMENTS To purchase this visit following link: Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM CRJ 306 ALL DQS AND ASSIGNMENTS CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 1 Criminal Law Terminology CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 2 Jurisdiction and Searches CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 1 Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and Concurrence CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 2 Due Process CRJ 306 Week 2 Ethics in Criminal Procedure CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 1 Fifth Amendment CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 2 Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause CRJ 306 Week 3 Parties and Pretrial Procedures CRJ 306 ALL DQS AND ASSIGNMENTS To purchase this visit following link: Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM CRJ 306 ALL DQS AND ASSIGNMENTS CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 1 Criminal Law Terminology CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 2 Jurisdiction and Searches CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 1 Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and Concurrence CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 2 Due Process CRJ 306 Week 2 Ethics in Criminal Procedure CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 1 Fifth Amendment CRJ 306......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Actus Reus

...What is Actus Reus? Actus Reus is the Latin word for the guilty or wrongful act. It is the physical element of the offence. The act or omission must be voluntary (deliberate). If the Defendant has no control of his actions the Actus Reus has not been committed. Actus Reus when proved beyond reasonable doubt in conjunction with Mens Rea ‘the guilty mind’ produces criminal liability. The Actus Reus of an offence is determined through sources, case law and statutes. The main elements of Actus Reus include: * Conduct * Voluntary Behaviour * Causation * Circumstances * Consequences * State of Affairs Conduct The accused must do something to commit an offence. The conduct itself might be criminal. For example taking money from another. The conduct of taking money from another represents the Actus Reus of theft. The Actus Reus of the crime is complete upon the conduct. Examples include: * Theft * Perjury * Using force to obtain property belonging to another * Rape * Possession of drugs Omissions (not doing something) A person cannot be liable for a failure to act unless the Defendant is under legal duty to take action. Duty to act arising from a contract – Pittwood [1902] When a person has a duty to act because of a duty arising from a contract, failure to perform the duty can make you criminally liable. The Defendant was employed by a railway company; he was a level crossing keeper. The Defendant negligently left......

Words: 2546 - Pages: 11

Crj 306 Homework Education Expert/Crj306Homework.Com

...CRJ 306 Entire Course (Ash) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 1 Criminal Law Terminology CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 2 Jurisdiction and Searches CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 1 Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and Concurrence CRJ 306 Week 2 DQ 2 Due Process CRJ 306 Week 2 Ethics in Criminal Procedure CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 1 Fifth Amendment CRJ 306 Week 3 DQ 2 Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause CRJ 306 Week 3 Parties and Pretrial Procedures CRJ 306 Week 4 DQ 1 Homicide CRJ 306 Week 4 DQ 2 Robbery and Extortion CRJ 306 Week 4 Sexual Predator Prosecution CRJ 306 Week 5 DQ 1 Double Jeopardy CRJ 306 Week 5 DQ 2 Mandatory Sentencing CRJ 306 Week 5 Final Paper ************************************************************************************* CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 1 Criminal Law Terminology (Ash) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT CRJ 306 Week 1 DQ 1 Criminal Law Terminology Law - General Law Criminal Law Terminology The textbook this week provided you with a wealth of information about key concepts in the foundations of criminal justice. In your primary response for this discussion, explain the differences between a misdemeanor and a felony charge. Detail how the legal terms stare decisis and legal precedent affect criminal prosecutions. Finally, provide a definition in your own words, for the legal term, corpus delicti. Why does corpus delicti have to be proven for there to be an effective criminal prosecution? *********************************...

Words: 575 - Pages: 3

What Is the Actus Reus

...Actus Reus Actus Reus means guilty act and is the physical element of a crime. AR is usually an act e.g. in R v Fagan, driving onto a policeman’s foot ad staying there can be an omission. An omission is a failure to act, the act must be voluntary. An example of an involuntary act is someone being stung by a swarm of bees whilst driving and losing control of the car. Some offences, such as murder and manslaughter (Offences Against the Person Act 1861) can be committed by an omission but only if there if a duty to act. A duty to act can arise where there is relationship e.g. R v Stone and Dobinson where the defendants took in the sister but failed to look after her properly. A duty to act can also arise under contract as in R v Pitwood where it was his job to close the gate. There is also a duty to act where the defendant creates a dangerous situation e.g. in R v Miller where the defendant failed to put out a fire he had accidently started. Mens Rea Mens Rea means guilty mind and is the mental element of the crime. It includes intention and recklessness. There are two types of intention; direct intention where the D wants the result as stated in R v Mohan. Indirect Intention is where the D foresees the result as virtually certain. In R v Hedrick where D set fire to a house, killing a child inside, the Court of Appeal stated that in the murder case, the jury were only entitled to find intention where death or GBH were virtually certain as the D realised this. This......

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Actus Reus and Men's Rea

...will be discussing in turn the actus reus and the mens rea, and the different factors that must be considered when trying to determine these elements of a crime. It is accurate in saying that two elements must be present, the actus reus and the mens rea when trying to determine whether someone is guilty of an offence, but you can not just take these words simply as they are. The actus reus can consist of more then just an act. In many circumstances, an omission can be just as serious, and it must be established at the very beginning whether it is an act or an omission you are dealing with. Causation must also be proved for the defendant to be liable for the consequences. The literal meaning of mens rea, 'a guilty mind' is also somewhat misleading. Other factors that are to be considered whilst discussing the above statement include the dynamics that constitute the necessary mens rea; whether the defendant had the intention of the consequences, and/or whether they acted recklessly (either Cunningham and Caldwell recklessness.) I will also be looking at strict liability cases, which is the one circumstance in which the defendant can be found guilty without the necessary mens rea. What ever the offence is at hand, the prosecution must establish every part of the actus reus, and it is crucial that these elements are strictly proved. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of the offence, they must have voluntarily brought about the actus reus. If the prosecution can......

Words: 270 - Pages: 2

As Law Paer 2 Model Answers

...AS LAW MODEL ANSWERS Define the actus reus of a crime (7 mins) The actus reus is the physical and external part of a crime. It means the guilty act. The actus reus must be a positive and voluntary act as illustrated in the case of Hill vs Baxter. In this case the judge said that driving whilst fighting off a swarm of bees would prevent the act from being voluntary, therefore preventing the actus reus from being satisfied. If the actus reus of a crime is not satisfied the defendant can never be found guilty. However there are six situations where a failure to act (omission) will satisfy the actus reus of a crime. These are exceptions to the rule in Hill v Baxter that the act committed must be positive. A person will have a duty to act if they assume the duty voluntarily, as illustrated in Stone v Dobinson, where the defendants failed to provide adequate care for their aunt when they said they would look after her. Pittwood illustrates that a contract can require a person to act, in this case the defendant failed to shut a gate, causing death, which he was required to under contract. In Miller the defendant created a dangerous situation and satisfied the actus reus of a crime as he did not take any steps to extinguish a fire which he created. In Dytham the policeman held an official position, which required him to act, therefore he was guilty of misconduct when he failed to act while someone got kicked to death. Gibbins v Proctor illustrates that parents have a......

Words: 1220 - Pages: 5